Who Sux More? NickleBack or Puddle Of Mudd (lyrics, singer)

Ma Cherie · 01-28-2007, 02:47 PM

nickleback does have some good lyrics, but i still like puddle of mud better, its not as generic

QueenNothing · 01-29-2007, 10:52 AM

Nickelback!!!!

Inuzuka Skysword · 01-29-2007, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Nickelback do have some good lyrics.

As in talent or as in sound good because they talk about generic things? First of all I can find so many bands that have lyrics that sound just like theirs, but they came first. Second of all romance lyrics aren't truly coming from the heart these days and I think this a good example. Third of all romantic lyrics are overused and I and many others get tired of them whining about some girlfriend they had in highschool.

sleepy jack · 01-29-2007, 03:28 PM

Inuzuka Skysword pwnz.

*dave63* · 03-14-2007, 09:20 PM

Puddle of Mud, most definetly

~~TheUsedToolguy~~ · 03-14-2007, 09:36 PM

well since Puddle of Mudd had a good song, 'Blurry', and pretty much everything Nickelback has put out in the last 5 years has been horrible, I'll go with Nickelback

sleepy jack · 03-14-2007, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheUsedToolguy

well since Puddle of Mudd had a good song, 'Blurry', and pretty much everything Nickelback has put out in the last 5 years has been horrible, I'll go with Nickelback

Wha? Going by that logic wouldn't you pick puddle of mudd...

~~TheUsedToolguy~~ · 03-14-2007, 10:37 PM

the thread says, which band sux more?

sleepy jack · 03-14-2007, 10:37 PM

Oh right haha, my bad.

Rainard Jalen · 03-15-2007, 02:47 AM

Nickelback have a better sense of drama and the theatrical than Puddle Of Mudd. But Puddle Of Mudd have a better lead guitarist. Then again, Nickelback have a better drummer. And they're more creative, melodically speaking. But Puddle Of Mudd have denser, deeper instrumental arrangements. Though they also use more overused chord progressions.

Wouldn't it be swell if Puddle Of Mudd and Nickelback combined to form one superband? You'd then have one of the most dexterous radio rock combinations ever to come off a major label.

01-28-2007, 02:47 PM	#171 (permalink)
Ma Cherie The Forums Sadistic Ghost Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: beyond midnight, in the abyss of time, the syren in the night Posts: 457	nickleback does have some good lyrics, but i still like puddle of mud better, its not as generic __________________ I'm not a freak on a leash, I'm just the freak holding the leash. http://www.myspace.com/yukiko_mori

01-29-2007, 10:52 AM	#172 (permalink)
QueenNothing music=life Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Kansas Posts: 152	Nickelback!!!!

03-14-2007, 09:20 PM	#175 (permalink)
dave63 Groupie Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2	Puddle of Mud, most definetly

03-14-2007, 09:36 PM	#176 (permalink)
~~TheUsedToolguy~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Joplin, MO Posts: 468	well since Puddle of Mudd had a good song, 'Blurry', and pretty much everything Nickelback has put out in the last 5 years has been horrible, I'll go with Nickelback

03-14-2007, 10:37 PM	#178 (permalink)
~~TheUsedToolguy~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Joplin, MO Posts: 468	the thread says, which band sux more?

03-15-2007, 02:47 AM	#180 (permalink)
Rainard Jalen Music Addict Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 2,221	Nickelback have a better sense of drama and the theatrical than Puddle Of Mudd. But Puddle Of Mudd have a better lead guitarist. Then again, Nickelback have a better drummer. And they're more creative, melodically speaking. But Puddle Of Mudd have denser, deeper instrumental arrangements. Though they also use more overused chord progressions. Wouldn't it be swell if Puddle Of Mudd and Nickelback combined to form one superband? You'd then have one of the most dexterous radio rock combinations ever to come off a major label.