Nickelback might be the worst band to make it big. The lead singer sounds like he has been smoking a pack a day for 30 years. Puddle of Mudd was good back in the day.

Oh come on your not saying chad croger isn't a telented vocalist, if anyone on this forum can ****ing sing better than him i'll take my hat off to you.

Having looked some other songs up (don't ask me to name them <___<) I've decided that Nickelback > Puddle of Mudd.

lol he isn't a talented vocalist. Look at the guy's range I mean it is terrible.

They are the best genres....

Name one then, right now....

"Name one then, right now...."

name what? good mainstream emo bands?

the cure are good, and though not entirely mainstream-fugazi manages to have a pretty big fanbase.

And both of those bands have been dubbed "emo" which doesn't mean anything really.
*off subject*
didn't it used to stand for emotive hardcore? what exactly does that mean?

I have heard both and am not a fan of either.

And yes the definition has changed. Emotive hardcore is called screamo (wild guess.)

they are both complete wastes of the american publics time
screw payola bands

You don't know emo, and I havn't seen a single mainstream emo band either.

Nickelback does have a terrible vocalist, I can sing better then him. He has no range and his voice isn't anything great either. Also DontRunMeOver is a million times better then him. A_Perfect_Sonnet also.

nickelback songs are f*cking easy as hell to sing. Like someone else said, they've got a very shallow range. Any drunken hick in a kareokee bar can sound the same as nickelback. all you have to do is smoke for a few hours so your vocal chords are good and shot, then force the words out in a gravely half-scream, and voila! you are now the newest half-a**ed eddy vedder clone!

It doesn't matter how hard you pew pew this thread won't die.

http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l2...tow/pewpew.jpg


pr00f