Why I hate Metallica - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-18-2009, 09:55 PM   #341 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
The Abominable Homan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottsy View Post
But it was different, and it was a good listen lyrically, especially when I ad some demons to exorcise!
I'M MADLY IN ANGER WITH YOU!

Ok, I agree with most of the other stuff you said, but I found the lyrics on St. Anger were usually just silly.

I feel that musically, it may very well be one of their worst in my opinion, but it's worth respecting simply for being them trying a new thing, even if it didn't always work. The decision make the drums sound like that was a little odd (I know they were going for the garage sound, but that doesn't mean you should intentionally have things sound bad), but at least it made Lars' drumming stand out for once to me (even if it's for the wrong reasons ).
__________________
Rate Your Musics
The Abominable Homan is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 01:02 AM   #342 (permalink)
Palm Muted
 
Hesher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo View Post
I never got all The Black Album hate to be honest.

Everytime an underground band goes "mainstream" then suddenly it's a big f*cking deal. Would metalheads be happier if they just kept trying to repeat the same album over and over and over?

Well since we're talking about a metal band here, yeah that's exactly what it is.

It's not on par with their earlier material but I think it's a good album nonetheless.
I don't hate the Black Album. And no, it's not a "big f*cking deal" when "underground" bands go "mainstream". Notice that I used prodigious quotation marks because all those terms are bullshit. Metallica was never an underground band except for their very very early days; they were quite mainstream almost all the way up to and including the Black Album, and they were still excellent. The reason I don't forgive their experimentation is because it's fine to change your sound but there is no excuse for producing shitty music when you clearly have the capability to do more. That's what my entire rant was about two pages ago. Instead of getting more technically complex and creative, they adopted alternative rock and decided that would be good enough to keep with the times. That is a pathetic step. Fuck you for suggesting metalheads only like the same album over and over. There are thousands of metal bands doing extremely creative things and changing their sounds radically from album to album; on the other hand, some musicians in the scene like to make a band to do one specific sound, and then start a new one when it's time to change. That's not "exactly what it is". You are just as guilty of attacking metal as a genre as the people you whine about for telling you the truth about how prog is a genre specifically invented for fat nerds by fat nerds (and I LIKE prog). It's a good album if you like throwing up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog View Post
I think a large degree comes from, as I've been told, the "universe of **** it gave way to" a la Godsmack, Korn, Limp Bizkit's

I guess peopel saw the lightening up of the sound, a more rock oriented move, to bring the dawn of the nu-metal era.

I don't agree with that, I feel if anything, Metallica led only to a small portion of that. Ultimatly, no band of that era matched skill levels or used general topics like they did (maybe general lyrics, which is a lot different and a lot worse).

The metal kids themselves clearly hate it because it doesn't sound like a wrench in the gears at the chainsaw factory. I could probably make a platnium selling metal album so long as I looped tightly enough the sounds metal objects crashing to the ground.

And thats really what modern metal is, Stomp with darker overtones.
I don't think Metallica is responsible for shitty music, I think they released the album based on what was popular at the time, which is a far worse excuse than feeling the need to experiment. But you are very, very incorrect about their skill level. There were tons of metal bands in the 80s that made Metallica look like kids at Best Buy playing Guitar Hero, and even outside of the genre there were tons of far more capable musicians. They were good songwriters, they put on a good show, and they had good lyrics, so they were deservedly popular. But it had nothing to do with technical skill. And a lot of metalheads hate it because it's poorly recorded, poorly mixed, poorly written, poorly played, and overall a bad representative of what metal is supposed to sound like - in fact, it sounds MORE like a wrench in a chainsaw factory than a lot of other metal bands. Have you heard Lars' snare drum? As a drummer it made me want to cry. If you have a paid drum tech you should not sound like that. There is a difference between trying to sound "garage" and sounding lik crap. Calling that sound "garage" was an insult to real, actual, non-record-label garage bands all over the world. We know how to tune our instruments, thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo View Post
Fans don't want good albums or for bands to try different things, they want albums that conform to the style they're most accustomed to hearing. It's a hipster thing, a band releases an album with universial appeal and gains them a whole new audience, then the older fans rant like little school children. "We were here first".
o im sory......... ur rong. It's not a "hipster thing". The people who are the "universal" part of "universal appeal" often have horrible taste and listen to whatever is playing on the radio. Those are the people I saw at the last Metallica show. It has nothing to do with "being here first". It has everything to do with metalheads not putting up with a good band releasing a terrible album when they should have been capable of a lot more. If you can't cut it anymore, quit it and start something else. I think metalheads hold bands to a high standard, and saying that we are obsessed with 'sellouts' is simply a cop-out for people who don't listen to metal enough to know what kind of quality we expect.

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo View Post
I disagree on that. I think if anything Metalica were one of the least technically competent big metal bands, at least they were when Burton died.

Lars isn't a really good drummer, Hammett is nowhere near as skilled as many other metal lead guitarists, Newsted was a decent bassist but never had much to do and and because he could never match up to what Burton did, he's gotten a very bum rap.

It's Hetfield that really held the band together, and it's his skills as both a rhythm guitarist and a songwriter that put's Metallica leagues above their peers.
I agree with all of this. I would say after Burton died they lost a lot of their skill base. He wrote a surprising amount of material for the band and was especially creative.

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo View Post
Well Megadeth also wrote songs about political and social topics. But then again, Megadeth was always Dave Mustaine's bitter attempt to outdo his former bandmates at whatever they did.
When Mustaine stops singing I will check them out, I always said - but after A Tout Le Monde they lost whatever shreds of credibility they might have had. That song insulted good French metal bands like Yyrkoon.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merkaba View Post
I disagree, I think that album cops 95% of it's flak due to it's release environment, and Metallica's fuck-off-up-high-in-the-music-sky mantle piece from past albums. A comparatively bad album doesn't make for an outright bad album. And that album does have some good songs.
It copped 100% of its flak because it was poorly written, included no solos (which arguably were one of the interesting things about Metallica), had a bass player that didn't suit the band in the slightest, had idiotic, mind-numbing lyrics, and was recorded by a multi-million dollar engineer trying to sound bad. Remember that most highly paid engineers sneer at garage bands and therefore was in fact, in his mind, trying to make the music sound terrible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Abominable Homan View Post
To be honest, I don't really like any of Metallica's music, but I tend to respect St. Anger the most just for being their attempt to do something different. It's not music I enjoy, but it's better than another rehash of MoP or RtL.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Abominable Homan View Post
I'M MADLY IN ANGER WITH YOU!

Ok, I agree with most of the other stuff you said, but I found the lyrics on St. Anger were usually just silly.

I feel that musically, it may very well be one of their worst in my opinion, but it's worth respecting simply for being them trying a new thing, even if it didn't always work. The decision make the drums sound like that was a little odd (I know they were going for the garage sound, but that doesn't mean you should intentionally have things sound bad), but at least it made Lars' drumming stand out for once to me (even if it's for the wrong reasons ).
That's like saying watching porn is acceptable because it's doing something different than working. A change of tone doesn't necessitate a drop in the level of musicianship or creativity.
Hesher is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 01:26 AM   #343 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
The Abominable Homan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesher View Post
That's like saying watching porn is acceptable because it's doing something different than working. A change of tone doesn't necessitate a drop in the level of musicianship or creativity.
No, it's like saying that a band finally doing something different in their career is respectable, even if it doesn't entirely go well. Like I've said before (in a somewhat more eloquent way), I've always felt they were ****, so the drop in musicianship was hardly noticeable. So they stopped playing solos, the solos were rarely any good in the first place. It wasn't a drop in creativity though, I've been saying this whole time that it was finally something different and therefore more creative.
__________________
Rate Your Musics
The Abominable Homan is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 01:37 AM   #344 (permalink)
Palm Muted
 
Hesher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Abominable Homan View Post
It wasn't a drop in creativity though, I've been saying this whole time that it was finally something different and therefore more creative.
So if I always pee but once in a while I take a shit, that's creative? I think you see where I'm going with this.
Hesher is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 01:43 AM   #345 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
The Abominable Homan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesher View Post
So if I always pee but once in a while I take a shit, that's creative? I think you see where I'm going with this.
So if they just made another MoP clone like they had been doing over and over, that would be more creative? And umm...there's never really going to be any creativity/lack of creativity about your excretions; that may be the worst analogy I've ever heard.
__________________
Rate Your Musics
The Abominable Homan is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 01:49 AM   #346 (permalink)
Palm Muted
 
Hesher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Abominable Homan View Post
So if they just made another MoP clone like they had been doing over and over, that would be more creative? And umm...there's never really going to be any creativity/lack of creativity about your excretions; that may be the worst analogy I've ever heard.
If you seriously think that Ride The Lightning and ...And Justice For All are clones of MoP, you should just stop talking right now. Really. You have little to no basis of comparison as you obviously don't like Metallica enough to listen to them. Death Magnetic is probably the closest thing ever recorded to an MoP clone; it sounds exactly like another band covering old Metallica with different song titles.

I was just being facetious about the excretions.
Hesher is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 01:51 AM   #347 (permalink)
Registered Abuser
 
Wayfarer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 573
Default

How could they make MOP clones "over and over" when they only released one album between it and the black album?
Wayfarer is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 01:55 AM   #348 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
The Abominable Homan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesher View Post
If you seriously think that Ride The Lightning and ...And Justice For All are clones of MoP, you should just stop talking right now. Really. You have little to no basis of comparison as you obviously don't like Metallica enough to listen to them. Death Magnetic is probably the closest thing ever recorded to an MoP clone; it sounds exactly like another band covering old Metallica with different song titles.
Actually I used to like Metallica and have listened to all of their albums (well, outside of Load and Reload which I fortunately never got) fairly extensively. Are you telling me you decide you don't like bands without having listened to them? I personally decide what I like and dislike after having heard it.

Very good tactic you used there though. "If you disagree with me, you have no idea what you're talking about and should stop."

And of course the amazing "If you don't like a band you haven't listened to them enough and shouldn't talk about them." Wonderful assumption.

EDIT:

Quote:
How could they make MOP clones "over and over" when they only released one album between it and the black album?
Oh, Ride The Lightning came first. I got them mixed up, replace it with RtL clone then. Kill 'Em All at least had a kind of different sound so I'll ignore it.
__________________
Rate Your Musics
The Abominable Homan is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 01:56 AM   #349 (permalink)
Master, We Perish
 
Surell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesher View Post
Death Magnetic is probably the closest thing ever recorded to an MoP clone; it sounds exactly like another band covering old Metallica with different song titles.
Well damn it, maybe I need to take that Father's Day gift back...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhateverDude View Post
Laser beams, psychedelic hats, and for some reason kittens. Surrel reminds me of kittens.
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits
Spoiler for guess what:
|i am a heron i ahev a long neck and i pick fish out of the water w/ my beak if you dont repost this comment on 10 other pages i will fly into your kitchen tonight and make a mess of your pots and pans
Surell is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 02:00 AM   #350 (permalink)
Palm Muted
 
Hesher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Abominable Homan View Post
Actually I used to like Metallica and have listened to all of their albums (well, outside of Load and Reload which I fortunately never got) fairly extensively. Are you telling me you decide you don't like bands without having listened to them? I personally decide what I like and dislike after having heard it.

Very good tactic you used there though. "If you disagree with me, you have no idea what you're talking about and should stop."

And of course the amazing "If you don't like a band you haven't listened to them enough and shouldn't talk about them." Wonderful assumption.
Well then, you have no excuse for thinking that ...AJFA and RtL are MoP clones. They aren't. They are dramatically different, broski. I don't know where the hell you got the idea that I decide I don't like bands without listening to them. Of course, there are some exceptions, but I shouldn't have to subject my ears to tripe.

That's not a tactic, it's the truth

It's not about whether you like them or not, it's fine if you don't - but I won't put up with people saying that any of Metallica's excellent pre-Load albums are in any way "clones" of MoP. That just betrays a lack of understanding in my opinion, which I guess in your case I mistook for a lack of listening.
Hesher is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.