Metal Wars!!!!!!!!!!! - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2012, 09:39 AM   #1511 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjinnx View Post
Vince ruins the band if anything. Big reason why I don't like them. They could of been good if he was out of the picture.
He can sound cheesy sure, but he sounds amazing on Too Fast for Love. His voice still has a sleezy quality to it, but the Cheap Trick influence that's still there gives his voice an almost innocent quality at the same time. And whoever said that the production was weak, it is. And it makes it great. The weakish production combined with Vince's voice just give it this youthful, amatuerish energy that just gives me lady wood.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2012, 01:25 PM   #1512 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjinnx View Post
Vince ruins the band if anything. Big reason why I don't like them. They could of been good if he was out of the picture.
He was, and they got a 'proper' singer.

The album stiffed.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2012, 01:42 PM   #1513 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
hip hop bunny hop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
Default

I <3 the Crue, dunno how anyone can't dig his voice. What, you want some Bruce Dickenson type up there? Wouldn't work.
__________________
Have mercy on the poor.
hip hop bunny hop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2012, 01:54 PM   #1514 (permalink)
Neo-Maxi-Zoom-Dweebie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 3,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop View Post
I <3 the Crue, dunno how anyone can't dig his voice. What, you want some Bruce Dickenson type up there? Wouldn't work.
I'm assuming you voted for The Crue then and that takes the vote to a 4-4 tie. My vote goes to The Crue, Too Fast is a fantastic album. Vince Neil's vocals were everything that was right with that album and SATD.

5-4 Motley Crue
FRED HALE SR. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2012, 02:42 PM   #1515 (permalink)
The Aerosol in your Soul
 
Rjinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 1,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
He can sound cheesy sure, but he sounds amazing on Too Fast for Love. His voice still has a sleezy quality to it, but the Cheap Trick influence that's still there gives his voice an almost innocent quality at the same time. And whoever said that the production was weak, it is. And it makes it great. The weakish production combined with Vince's voice just give it this youthful, amatuerish energy that just gives me lady wood.
I agree that sleazy definitely suited the band. A lot less cheesy it might of worked. If Neil's voice wasn't so weak and worked with a dirtier rage, it still would of pulled off a young angsty voice. I never really picked up on any innocent touch. Amateurish yes, still would of faired better without clutter of cheesiness. An innocent touch would have made them a little more intriguing, especially when they were anything but an innocent band. But because of those weak qualities compared to the rest of the production it fails to resonate, if it were even there. Something in his voice just sounded really off.

Too Fast For Love, as I've given praise to before, is the closest they've come, but still isn't something I would sprint to listen to. You could hear the potential of excellence in their intro album, but unfortunately they never risen after that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger ? View Post
He was, and they got a 'proper' singer.

The album stiffed.
Yet he came back and they were still stiffed. :P
__________________
last.fm
Rjinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2012, 04:07 PM   #1516 (permalink)
Horribly Creative
 
Unknown Soldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger ? View Post
Would have thought it was obvious ...

Of course I knew that, I just forgot to plug my brain in when I typed the question.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by eraser.time206 View Post
If you can't deal with the fact that there are 6+ billion people in the world and none of them think exactly the same that's not my problem. Just deal with it yourself or make actual conversation. This isn't a court and I'm not some poet or prophet that needs everything I say to be analytically critiqued.
Metal Wars

Power Metal

Pounding Decibels- A Hard and Heavy History
Unknown Soldier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2012, 10:26 PM   #1517 (permalink)
air quote
 
Engine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: pollen & mold
Posts: 3,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop View Post
I <3 the Crue, dunno how anyone can't dig his voice. What, you want some Bruce Dickenson type up there? Wouldn't work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. View Post
I'm assuming you voted for The Crue then and that takes the vote to a 4-4 tie. My vote goes to The Crue, Too Fast is a fantastic album. Vince Neil's vocals were everything that was right with that album and SATD.

5-4 Motley Crue
I'm not sure that his post amounts to a vote for Too Fast for Love over Stay Hungry. I'll argue that the vote stands at 4 to 4. Unless the Bunny explains, I suppose Unknown Soldier should make the call.
__________________
Like an arrow,
I was only passing through.
Engine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2012, 10:30 PM   #1518 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

okay, deliberated long enough

much as I love that Twisted Sister, I think Too Fast for Love is one of the best the genre has to offer, especially the Japanese remaster

Crue - 5
Sister - 4

(whilst Hale's vote gets sorted out)
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2012, 12:02 AM   #1519 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
Default

I don't know if I can take all the exclamation marks in the title much longer. Just warning you guys.
someonecompletelyrandom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2012, 07:39 AM   #1520 (permalink)
air quote
 
Engine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: pollen & mold
Posts: 3,108
Default

This new atheist Conan is so full of spiritual unrest. Slow down, my freshly heathen friend, and take your newfound freedom in stride.
These punctuations can no longer hurt you. They are not the spiritual prison bars that linger between you and your fading fear of Christian dogma. Embrace the many exclamation points and be free.
__________________
Like an arrow,
I was only passing through.
Engine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.