Future Hall of Famers

~~someonecompletelyrandom~~ · 01-18-2011, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by janszoon

[2]

TockTockTock · 01-18-2011, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VocalsBass

Now you change your mind! What about Chad Kroeger and NICKELBACK ?

I consider them "dude" rock. Simplistic, easy to understand, and repetitive.

~~someonecompletelyrandom~~ · 01-19-2011, 02:56 AM

You forgot boring. They aren't even fun to make fun of anymore

MoonlitSunshine · 01-19-2011, 03:30 AM

Never made it as a blind man, couldn't make good music either...

The Batlord · 01-19-2011, 11:30 AM

**** the Hall of Fame. It's just a money grab. They inducted Grandmaster Flash. Come on! I have nothing against Grandmaster Flash, but what the hell does he have to do with rock?!

Unknown Soldier · 01-19-2011, 12:37 PM

[QUOTE=MC 1989;987357]

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackPat

Linkin' Park, well... I don't see anything special about them.

Linkin Park has been the most talented band of the past decade. Really I think there only competition is Avenged Sevenfold.

Linkin Park are an awful band and a disgrace to rock and metal.

MC 1989 · 01-19-2011, 04:34 PM

I think Nickelback is a possible future choice but all there songs have sounded the same from the begining (How You Remind me & Someday were the first) and most of them have the same meaning.And ok maybe they arn't the most talented recently but Linkin Park and Nine Inch Nails defined synth rock so personally I think they'd deserve it.

Zer0 · 01-19-2011, 05:01 PM

Linkin Park and Nine Inch Nails defined synth-rock? But what about all those bands in the 70's and 60's that integrated synths into their sound?

Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra · 01-19-2011, 07:42 PM

Look into Sun Ra, Residents, Bruce Haack, and Kraftwork.

Albeit not all rock(Sun Ra, for example) they are pretty much four excellent examples of synth-based music being explored extensively long before even Trent Reznor who is somehow given massive amounts of credit for inventing a genre that was already well well established before he came along.

As for Linkin Park they really are not even remotely inventive.

mr dave · 01-20-2011, 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MC 1989

I think Nickelback is a possible future choice but all there songs have sounded the same from the begining (How You Remind me & Someday were the first) and most of them have the same meaning.And ok maybe they arn't the most talented recently but Linkin Park and Nine Inch Nails defined synth rock so personally I think they'd deserve it.

see... this is where you messed up and made it obvious you're trolling.

01-19-2011, 03:30 AM	#24 (permalink)
MoonlitSunshine Dat's Der Bunny! Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Ireland Posts: 1,088	Never made it as a blind man, couldn't make good music either... __________________ "I found it eventually, at the bottom of a locker in a disused laboratory, with a sign on the door saying "Beware of the Leopard". Ever thought of going into Advertising?" - Arthur Dent

01-19-2011, 05:01 PM	#28 (permalink)
Zer0 ∞ Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Ireland Posts: 3,792	Linkin Park and Nine Inch Nails defined synth-rock? But what about all those bands in the 70's and 60's that integrated synths into their sound? __________________ Last FM \| RYM \| The Final Sound

01-19-2011, 02:56 AM	#23 (permalink)
~~someonecompletelyrandom~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,538	You forgot boring. They aren't even fun to make fun of anymore

01-19-2011, 04:34 PM	#27 (permalink)
MC 1989 Groupie Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 11	I think Nickelback is a possible future choice but all there songs have sounded the same from the begining (How You Remind me & Someday were the first) and most of them have the same meaning.And ok maybe they arn't the most talented recently but Linkin Park and Nine Inch Nails defined synth rock so personally I think they'd deserve it.