The Official Grunge Thread - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: best grunge albums
Pearl Jam "Ten" 2 13.33%
Nirvana "Nevermind" 6 40.00%
Alice in Chains "Dirt" 2 13.33%
Afghan Whigs "Gentlemen" 1 6.67%
Mudhoney "Superfuzz Bugmuff" 0 0%
Soundgarden "Superunknown" 3 20.00%
Bush "Sixteen Stone" 1 6.67%
Stone Temple Pilots "Core" 0 0%
Silverchair "Frogstomp" 0 0%
Screaming Trees "Clairvoyance" 0 0%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-06-2007, 03:34 PM   #111 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
Default

I just think it's humorous to see something like "grunge is not dead" being written in... 2007.
Rainard Jalen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 05:21 PM   #112 (permalink)
A Thorn For Every Heart
 
gottaSCREM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oojay View Post
Any new grunge bands to look for that we may not have heard of?
Check out Blood Circus, Supersuckers, Seaweed, ****less, Thrown-Ups, Dead Moon, and Gruntruck.

Hey Snickers thanks a bunch for your help. And I think I should correct my use of Seattle Sound because most of the good grunge bands didn't even come from Seattle they came from Portland Except Nirvana, Pearl Jam and AIC.
gottaSCREM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 05:29 PM   #113 (permalink)
A Thorn For Every Heart
 
gottaSCREM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
The whole grunge thing to me was just one of the worst musical movements ever and showed up everything that is bad about the music industry.
Which of course to me is the biggest irony of all seeing as though we`re constantly told Nirvana 'Broke the inderground' and 'changed the whole of music'.
For a genre that took about 10/12 years to die of you`d expect more than 2 bands of any merit to come from it (Soundgarden & Nirvana) As for the rest of them. Alice In Chains just wrote MTV friendly angst rock with a couple of ballads to get more airplay , Pearl Jam were just some dull stadium rock band who just happened to be from the right city at the right time who just had the foresight to namecheck the likes of The Dead Boys & Neil Young rather than Led Zeppelin.Mudhoney spent their whole career milking every last drop of credibility from the one decent song they wrote (Touch Me I`m Sick), as for the rest , well they were just major label puppets signed to get a quick payoff from Nirvana's success.
As for the legacy of grunge and they breaking of the underground , well where is it?
As someone who actually listened to independent music in the mid - late 90s I didn`t see an awful lot of bands I liked suddenly getting any exposure. All I saw was a couple of hundred Nirvana clones.The legacy of grunge is hundreds of grunge lite bands making naff middle of the road staduim rock appearing on MTV over & over again , I would name names but everybody knows who i`m talking about here. between 1998 - 2002 you couldn`t move for all this crap. Meanwhile the 'real' underground stayed exactly that.Bands like Pavement , Slint , Mogwai , Thee Headcoats , Smog and many others who I consider to be the true bands who influenced modern underground music didn`t benefit from Nirvana's success and the whole grunge movement whatsoever.

The whole thing was a big con by record companies to try & tap into the 'alternative' music fan.They were going for the anti establishment dollar , and by God did people fall for it in their millions.

Number one if you watched the movie Hype! you'll realize nearly all the grunge bands didn't want to be big stars it sort of just happened, all of the big bands even all of the smaller bands were garage bands not intending to make it big. When you bring up songs written by other bands and songwriters this shows that the bands that re-did the song had respect towards the artist
that originally made it, it's no wonder why those songs were good because those bands like Mudhoney spent days trying to make the song great and it was a very great song as well as all of the other re-did songs.
gottaSCREM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 05:32 PM   #114 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

Man, you totally didn't counter anything anyone said with some intelligent.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 05:38 PM   #115 (permalink)
A Thorn For Every Heart
 
gottaSCREM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 248
Default

Bite me , go back to the emo thread
gottaSCREM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 08:32 PM   #116 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gottaSCREM View Post
Number one if you watched the movie Hype! you'll realize nearly all the grunge bands didn't want to be big stars it sort of just happened, all of the big bands even all of the smaller bands were garage bands not intending to make it big.
First of all I don`t really care what someones motivation for making music is. I judge it purely on what I hear.If it sounds like a weak Nirvana clone thats obviously only been signed by a record company to make a bit of money then i`ll say thats what it is. And if you think there are any less people invoved in grunge that are 'in it for the money' than any other genre you are seriously deluding yourself. If artists were about 'the music' and not money perhaps you can point me in the direction of all the best critically acclaimed grunge albums released on independent labels between 1994 & 2000.

Quote:
When you bring up songs written by other bands and songwriters this shows that the bands that re-did the song had respect towards the artist
that originally made it, it's no wonder why those songs were good because those bands like Mudhoney spent days trying to make the song great and it was a very great song as well as all of the other re-did songs.
I would try & counter this point but I have a feeling not even you know what it is.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 09:20 PM   #117 (permalink)
A Thorn For Every Heart
 
gottaSCREM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 248
Default

Dude, the bands never in a million years thought that grunge was going to be as big as it was, hints why most bands signed to sub-pop records or K-records never played in a big venue from 1986-1991 they always played in bars and in back of warehouses across the Pacific Northwest once Pearl Jams Ten and Nirvana's Nevermind came out all of a sudden bigger labels were trying to sign as many grunge bands as possible in hopes of finding the next nirvana as for calling most of the bands Nirvana clones is not true listen to all of the other grunge bands and you'll see almost all of them doesn't have the same sound or even the same song writing as Nirvana. Nirvana was original with everything just letting all of his emotions out as for some other bands wrote about anything and everything but it was all great stuff.
For the best independent albums in 1994 easy one Love Battery Nehru Jacket, an epic Mono Men Sin and Tonic album, and lastly Mad Season's Above were all great albums from indie labels.
You think I won't know something buddy give me your best shot.

Last edited by gottaSCREM; 01-06-2007 at 09:26 PM.
gottaSCREM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 09:32 PM   #118 (permalink)
dontcareaboutyou
 
swim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,188
Default

Nirvana weren't original. They stole their career from Pixies.
__________________
http://nakednaps.bandcamp.com/
swim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 09:38 PM   #119 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gottaSCREM View Post
Dude, the bands never in a million years thought that grunge was going to be as big as it was, hints why most bands signed to sub-pop records or K-records never played in a big venue from 1986-1993 they always played in bars and in back of warehouses across the Pacific Northwest
What the hell? are your rose tinted glasses really that thick. This whole thing of a clique of naive young bands sitting around one day and finding themselves famous ...it never happened.A few of them got signed , but they never did anything. They made maybe one or two albums that sold next to nothing and got dropped.They were also rans filling out a scene , nothing more. It happens with every scene.

Quote:
once Pearl Jams Ten and Nirvana's Nevermind came out all of a sudden bigger labels were trying to sign as many grunge bands as possible in hopes of finding the next nirvana as for calling most of the bands Nirvana clones is not true listen to all of the other grunge bands and you'll see almost all of them doesn't have the same sound or even the same song writing as Nirvana.
It was all MTV friendly angst rock for which Nirvana were the catalyst ....next

Quote:
Nirvana was original with everything just letting all of his emotions out as for some other bands wrote about anything and everything but it was all great stuff.
Nirvana were one of the most derivative simple bands going ,that was their appeal. They wern`t original they just stripped things back to basics & made it commerically viable. As for emotion , well thats just a typical songwriting standard that has been used for centuries I don`t see how you can credit Nirvana for that.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 09:39 PM   #120 (permalink)
A Thorn For Every Heart
 
gottaSCREM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 248
Default

they only stole the riff's from the pixies to make Smells Like Teen Spirts that's all no harm no foul, if I heard right the pixies didn't even mind that they did it anyway.

As for the hatemonger dude, have you ever been to seattle, Jack Endino once said when it's always raining the only thing to do is grab an instrament, go in the garage and make as much noise as possible to get all of your anger out. As for bands being dropped once a band was signed to either sub-pop or K-records usually the label kept the bands until the bands couldn't bring anymore music. Most bands stuck with their home town label with little or no dropping what so ever

Last edited by gottaSCREM; 01-06-2007 at 09:44 PM.
gottaSCREM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.