|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 539
|
![]()
Listened through about 3 EPs of Jesu...HOLY GOD amazing stuff. Everything just melds together musically, and even though there's a doom element in some of their songs- I never sense any melancholy overtones in the overall feeling of their music. Just an amazing band.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
Live by the Sword
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
|
![]() Quote:
followed by these two, if you liked that:- Something Else Arthur |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
No Ice In My Bourbon
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,327
|
![]() Quote:
Also, I have an odd question. I have Beggars Banquet, Exile and Sticky Fingers from the Stones and I have Who's Next, Live At Leeds, and Who Sell Out from the Who. I want to get another album from one of them and it's between Let It Bleed (I think that's their best album I don't have right?) from the Stones and Quadrophenia from The Who. What album should I get between them? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
Live by the Sword
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
|
![]() Quote:
if you want to get "Let it Bleed", get the latest 2008 (?) 24-bit remaster cos it's really dynamic and crunchy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) | |
No Ice In My Bourbon
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,327
|
![]() Quote:
Really? I had heard that the 90s master of Let It Bleed was much better and less compressed. So far, I have the 90s editions of all the Stones albums except for Exile which I have the remaster of. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) | |
Live by the Sword
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
|
![]() Quote:
i had the 90s Let It Bleed (threw it away in one of my mad fits), the 2008 remaster is a huge leap |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|