|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-21-2009, 02:41 PM | #461 (permalink) | ||
MB's Biggest Fanboy
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 2,852
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-21-2009, 09:39 PM | #462 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
|
Alright, I was being a bit harsh when I said I didn't think he deserved a spot but I think he gets too much credit. Bands like Screaming Trees and Mudhoney, who influenced Nirvana a great deal, don't really get any credit and yet both came before Nirvana did. Had there been no Mudhoney, I doubt Nirvana would have sounded like they did. Don't get me wrong, I own every Nirvana CD, but I really only find myself listening to four or five of their songs whereas I can listen to all of Mudhoney, half of Screaming Trees, and all of other bands like Soundgarden. I believe that Kurt's such vast influence was merely chance. For whatever reason, which I still do not understand, they were the ones who got the majority of the grunge credit so to speak. You can talk about raw emotion, but I'd argue that both Eddie Vedder, while I can't stand him as a person, and Layne Staley both put out a lot more emotion than he does.
Indeed, Kurt did show the world that you can make beautiful music out of simplicity, I believe that his influence, while it is vast indeed, was all sheer chance. Had, say, Screaming Trees broken out as the grunge front men, I'd be arguing the this the complete opposite way. |
04-22-2009, 06:25 AM | #463 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Everyone has influences, that's no reason to discredit anybody, thing is, Cobain has influenced more people than anyone that's influenced him (save Pixies), especially as a guitar player.
And no saying "everyone he influences sucks" is not a counter argument, he made a big impact and influence is influence no matter who it is. |
04-22-2009, 03:37 PM | #465 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 17
|
in my opinion Hendrix, Page, and everyone else that you guys were arguing about for "originality, influence, and talent" were good for their time but the new generation of guitarists like Nils Norberg, Per Nilsson, and kiko loureiro are just superior in every way.
i dont mean any disrespect to the old school "influencial" guys but its proven that musicians get better and better with every generation that passes |
04-22-2009, 04:46 PM | #466 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 803
|
Quote:
|
|
04-22-2009, 06:30 PM | #467 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
|
|
04-22-2009, 11:39 PM | #468 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
I think Boon deserves to be higher, Boon was by far one of the more gifted punk guitarists and he was a big influence on everything from RHCP to Fugazi, but yeah I like Mascis, I could see him going higher maybe.
|
04-22-2009, 11:49 PM | #469 (permalink) |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
well i'm just saying that because it's pretty obvious that J. was slightly more talented as a guitarist. and i understand, Boon had a much wider influence as a songwriter, but you gotta figure, Mascis actually spent the effort to combine all those influences of his into one singular entity (which had an enormous impact upon modern indie rock).
i like both as songwriters, i would have loved to see Minutemen while Boon was still alive. but it's pretty clear to me who the better guitarist was.
__________________
first.am |
04-22-2009, 11:52 PM | #470 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
And Boon didn't combine his influences to create his own style? I'd say he did. And yeah Mascis has a lot of indie influence so I might move him up a bit.
|
|