|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-21-2008, 07:15 PM | #21 (permalink) | |
The Passenger
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bucketheadland
Posts: 583
|
Quote:
dood, i said modests mouse's best stuff was 2001 and back, the moon and antarctica came out in 2000. disregard the original post. also think tank was NOT a pile of sh*t, it was brilliance. listen to Out Of Time, and tell me it wasnt the best song of 2003. also Ambulence and Good Song are works of genius. find me an oasis song that does ANYTHING out of the ordinary, whether it be time signature or anything that tries something new from what they have done in the past.
__________________
|
|
05-21-2008, 07:23 PM | #22 (permalink) | |||||
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
Like I said , I beleive it to be the worst they'd released up till that point
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And there are bands in there who they are forced to cover to sell papers because they are popular Examples : Oasis , Kula Shaker , Ocean Colour Scene You see how it works now? Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
|||||
05-21-2008, 07:48 PM | #23 (permalink) | |
The Passenger
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bucketheadland
Posts: 583
|
Quote:
2. i apologize that Think Tank wasnt like every other album out at the time, they tried something new and succeeded brilliantly. 3. basically Oasis went from writing Rock songs that sounded exactly the same to writing ballads that sounded exactly the same. 4. you listen to ABBA, therefore your argument is invalid.
__________________
|
|
05-21-2008, 08:28 PM | #24 (permalink) | |
The Passenger
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bucketheadland
Posts: 583
|
Quote:
1. i still love you 2. how was the album NOT adventurous, they tried something that neither they nor many other mainstream bands were doing. 3. they didnt sound the same per se but they were all very similar content wise and how they were written. and you say that blur wasn't adventurous. 4. i was joking.
__________________
|
|
05-21-2008, 08:49 PM | #25 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,578
|
Quote:
So I'm going to ask you, what exactly is so bad about Modest Mouse? I don't give a **** about the band, but sitting here listening to them I am inclined to say they made some GOOD MUSIC that I can really enjoy, even if EVERY Modest Mouse album has filler. What do you find so abominable about them? |
|
05-27-2008, 09:54 PM | #30 (permalink) |
Bigger and Better
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Texas girl living in the UK
Posts: 2,596
|
Metallica - "I liked until Lars came out as a flaming homo." Agreed! He's like the little yappy chihuahua to Hetfield's pitbull-ishness.
Nirvana - Never really got into Nirvana. I'm not denying they wrote some decent lyrics/songs, I just couldn't get into them. Oasis - Used to love, love, love these guys back in the 90's. Still have my "(What's the story) Morning Glory" t-shirt. For me personally though, they were just a fad, and they got old after a while. Modest Mouse - They are definitely an "acquired taste", though far from bland and unadventurous.
__________________
Hi. |