Am I Really The Only One? (metal, punk, rock, ballad) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-02-2008, 07:27 PM   #61 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Laughing Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 126
Default

I knew who the Gallagher brothers were before I knew who Oasis were.
__________________
He said, "Take a hit, hold your breath and I'll dunk your head
When you wake up again, you'll be high as hell and born again."
Laughing Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 12:44 AM   #62 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
SubPop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slint View Post
It's never a good idea to talk about the influence Nirvana has had, unless you want to chart into the territories of post-grunge, and trust me, you don't want to.
Man when I say influence I don't just mean "Gee that band sounds like Nirvana".

Nirvana changed the music industry. It open up the mainstream to all alternative bands "grunge" or not. It made record companies realise that the old formula for detemining the likely hood of success of a band had changed. It made kids think that they didn't have to be a guitar shredding guru to play in a successful rock band. It showed kids that guys in bands didn't have to be mucho, sleezy, ****heads.
SubPop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 12:08 PM   #63 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SubPop View Post
Man when I say influence I don't just mean "Gee that band sounds like Nirvana".

Nirvana changed the music industry. It open up the mainstream to all alternative bands "grunge" or not. It made record companies realise that the old formula for detemining the likely hood of success of a band had changed. It made kids think that they didn't have to be a guitar shredding guru to play in a successful rock band. It showed kids that guys in bands didn't have to be mucho, sleezy, ****heads.
You really think there's a difference in quality between Motley Crue & Nickleback?

F*ck it , i'd rather have Motley Crue , at least they were funny.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 01:01 PM   #64 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
You really think there's a difference in quality between Motley Crue & Nickleback?

F*ck it , i'd rather have Motley Crue , at least they were funny.
Not only that, but they had Dr. Feelgood. Nickelback, well, their best album (am I breaking a law by putting "Nickelback" and "best" in the same sentence?) is probably Silver Side Up. Pretty laughable in comparison, actually.
Civic Depreciator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 04:51 PM   #65 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 31
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slint View Post
Not only that, but they had Dr. Feelgood. Nickelback, well, their best album (am I breaking a law by putting "Nickelback" and "best" in the same sentence?) is probably Silver Side Up. Pretty laughable in comparison, actually.
Motley Crue's first few records were all pretty solid with the exception of Theatre of pain, which is somewhat debatable on whether it is viewed as a good record. Nickelback is decent but none of it is very memorable or stands out amongst what's out there in music. Then again, what the hell do I know?
rundonnierun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 05:44 PM   #66 (permalink)
Registered Jimmy Rustler
 
Dr_Rez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,360
Default

I think if people would listen to all of Silver Side Up and forget there previous bias they might actually enjoy it a some degree.

Songs like Hangnail, and Where Do i Hide which actually have pretty decent solo's.

(and yes im ready to be flamed)
__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew*
*Always Checks Credentials Crew*
*nba > nfl crew*
*Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew*
Dr_Rez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 07:05 PM   #67 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
SubPop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
You really think there's a difference in quality between Motley Crue & Nickleback?

F*ck it , i'd rather have Motley Crue , at least they were funny.
meh they are both sh.it , I guess in certain situations sh.it can be funny.....it is still sh.it though.
I was not saying that all rock post nirvana was good, I was just saying that Nirvana did open things up for some very good bands.

Last edited by SubPop; 06-03-2008 at 07:39 PM.
SubPop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 11:20 PM   #68 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
Default

metallica and nirvana are bands that were the first of their kind. metallica was too punk for the metal clubs and too metal for the punk clubs, so they combined the two and went big. as far as i know they were the first to do so on such a large scale. in the late 80s nearly all the good hair metal bands went soft and started writing ballads, and thats when nirvana came and kicked the sh*t out of all the puss ballad bands. it was something nobody had ever heard before.

so please understand that those 2 bands were the first of their kind and deserve more respect than you're putting out. modest mouse is also a good band but that's my opinion so i'll keep that to myself.

mjnichols is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 11:24 PM   #69 (permalink)
The Professor
 
Loser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjnichols View Post
metallica was too punk for the metal clubs and too metal for the punk clubs, so they combined the two and went big.
I think you confused Metallica with Nirvana. Nirvana were the ones to mix metal with punk (i.e. grunge) that was what grunge was, a mixture of punk and metal. Metallica was always metal-esque and if memory serves me right.
Loser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 11:26 PM   #70 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loser View Post
I think you confused Metallica with Nirvana. Nirvana were the ones to mix metal with punk (i.e. grunge) that was what grunge was, a mixture of punk and metal. Metallica was always metal-esque and if memory serves me right.
that line i stole staight from a metallica documentary.
mjnichols is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.