|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: | |||
0 | 0% | ||
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-22-2007, 11:31 PM | #1761 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4
|
alice in chains isnt bad....dont get me wrong Nirvana is my favorite band i basically only listen to them and its been 5 years now...i mean ill mix it in with Alice in Chains and a very tiny bit of Pearl Jam but they just bore me...unfortunately there will never be another Nirvana, but to say Alice in Chains is terrible is just ridiculous and that statement alone without me ever reading another post from you makes me think you are just blinded to the art that was Grunge, many often consider AIC the better of the 2 bands which i think is quite extreme but both will sorely be missed RIP Kurt Cobain and Layne Staley
__________________
|
08-23-2007, 10:51 PM | #1763 (permalink) | |
Bitchfarmer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Between the minarettes, down the Casbah way.
Posts: 983
|
Quote:
And I like them better than Nirvana.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Yup. Because I chose to play the fool in a six-piece band, First-night nerves every one-night stand. I should be glad to be so inclined. What a waste! What a waste! But I don't mind. |
|
08-23-2007, 10:52 PM | #1764 (permalink) | ||
Music Addict
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 697
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Finally, a signature that's chewy not chalky! Let's agree to disagree. |
||
08-23-2007, 10:57 PM | #1765 (permalink) |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
The fact that this is about 10 different Nirvana threads merged suggest to me it shouldn't.
And nobody is forcing you to reply in it.
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
08-25-2007, 11:41 AM | #1767 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,565
|
Quote:
Anyway, I personally think that Nirvana sucks anus, but, i believe that they were one of the forerunners in developing the modern conception of "grunge". although they used punk methodology to achieve that, i would still classify them as grunge. |
|
08-25-2007, 02:47 PM | #1768 (permalink) | ||
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 295
|
Despite my hate for Kurt Cobain and his overrated band, he did, in his day, say a few truthful and quoteable things:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
08-28-2007, 03:17 PM | #1769 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: California
Posts: 84
|
if you dont like the thread why are you replying in it??
__________________
http://a940.ac-images.myspacecdn.com...2c287a1aa3.jpg |
08-29-2007, 10:29 AM | #1770 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Norway.
Posts: 5
|
Oh my god!
I scroll down the page to see if there is some reasonable people out there.. But all I see is the word Grunge. " Nirvana was so totally a GRUNGE band! " If you really like Nirvana, like me, you'd know that they didn't count themselves as a grunge band, because grunge is absolutely nothing and no one knows who started the "grunge" music. GRUNGE IS NOTHING! Nirvana played Rock with a hint of Punk! |