|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#28 (permalink) | |
Ba and Be.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
|
![]() Quote:
When posters only post in the Metal forum and proceed to correct every man and his dog in sub genre etiquette, then I find it to be narrow minded and an excuse to appear open minded when all they are doing is listening to variations on a similar theme. I am not talking about bands that are obviously poles apart EG Iron Maiden and Pig Destroyer but many bands are so similar yet they are constantly assigned genre labels in order for them to appear different. If I was'nt into metal I would'nt dare make statements like this but I know what I'm talking about and I find this tagging annoying and laughable to a certain extent. I'm not trying to say I'm right at all. I'm not going to change a whole scene but in 10 years time many fans will realise how ridiculous the whole sub sub genre tagging is becoming. I have said before that the only genres that do this are Metal and Dance and both are predominantly listened to by the under 30's and are so incredibly insular it defies belief. I guess I find posts such as 'No way they are not Metalcore, they are Thrash with a hint of chugga breakdowns' and 'No way are they death metal, melodeath maybe' boring to read and not entirely constructive. People could retort with 'well don't read them then' but I DO want to read them. A) because it's my job as a mod and B) I still listen to metal and although I have heard so much, I still want to see if a band can break out of the masses and interest me. Sadly most of my time seems to be spent reading what they are tagged as instead of their plus points or originality etc. Rant over.
__________________
“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|