![]() |
Quote:
A lot of Norwegian Death Metal bands are more technical and original then RATM. And DB is not NDM they are technically in a Black Metal subgenre (I don't listen to them much so I wouldn't know.) RATM kills its songs for me. "Killing in the Name of" starts off well, but turns into crap. |
Quote:
|
I'm actually with Jackhammer on this one.
Stuff like that sounded great at the time because it was totally new & different to what anybody had done before. I remember hearing Napalm Death for the first time around 88/89 and being blown away by it. But by only a couple of years later the scene was overrun by bands who were just playing fast & shouting and added no originality to it.It's as if they were just copying how it sounded and missing the point that it was about pushing boundaries , which is one of the reasons I stopped listening to that kind of stuff in the mid 90s , it just got boring. |
Urban-we have agreement! I think we may be in the minority on this one, but totally correct of course!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you replaced RATM with STP, I would still have a hard time buying that. And how does more skill equate to making better music again? Quote:
|
Quote:
Do not take this beyond the point. Quote:
|
What are you taking about?. Theres like five different chord progressions in that song.
Besides, it's not like every song has to be in 11/4 time. Repetitive riffs are a rock music staple going from The Kinks all the way down to AC/DC to The White Stripes. Repetitive isn't always bad. |
Inzuka-u have Led Zep underneath your profile. So Black Dog is not repetitive... It's all swings and roundabouts my man..
|
Also Zep > Sabbath IMO.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:54 AM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.