Quote:
|
If you had taken any time to read my post, I said you can't define the limits of a diety, because in the boundaries of humanity, there are certain factors pertaining to such beings that can't be explored.
|
Other than I actually explored those factors with my post. Its like the bullet hit your foot in slow motion.
Quote:
|
No matter how much you deny any possibility of a god, you can never really know, reality prevents you from fully researching the topic
|
No it doesn't. Science exists for a reason. We can come up with theories and test them. Scientists have yet to simulate intelligent design and have yet to find anything that supports the claim. Alternatively they haven't disproven it yet so you're still in the clear.
Quote:
and it very well could be a god that refuses to be discovered by humanity at all.
It could do this with any creations previously given to man and taken for granted: free will, intelligent thought, externalized sense, or physical limitations.
|
Invisible pink unicorn?
Quote:
|
Whatever ethic you propose to deny the existence of a diety might conflict with laws and boundaries that are present in a seperate medium where reality is actually present, and that diety lives, or functions by (if not alive).
|
See my argument about the fairy tale world. I'm not sure what kind of Mike Mignola ass universe this proposed deity lives in but its not realistic.
Hybrid Mode