|
Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |||||
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Methville
Posts: 2,116
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If those different settings are based on illogical fantasy based ideas than you're correct. However, the writer of said piece of fiction can define those traits. If those said settings are realistically plausible than logic, rationale, and fact can define them just fine. The human mind is capable of functioning with rationality, knowledge, and common sense and thus can reason out that setting. Quote:
|
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | ||
snickers
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: detroit
Posts: 2,183
|
![]() Quote:
If you had taken any time to read my post, I said you can't define the limits of a diety, because in the boundaries of humanity, there are certain factors pertaining to such beings that can't be explored. No matter how much you deny any possibility of a god, you can never really know, reality prevents you from fully researching the topic, and it very well could be a god that refuses to be discovered by humanity at all. It could do this with any creations previously given to man and taken for granted: free will, intelligent thought, externalized sense, or physical limitations. Whatever ethic you propose to deny the existence of a diety might conflict with laws and boundaries that are present in a seperate medium where reality is actually present, and that diety lives, or functions by (if not alive). Quote:
Since your opinion is biased based on limited perception and your spectrum of thought is entirely subject to the creation of any diety in the first place, this argument is flawed. Twice on one definition and once on another, out of four definitions, makes you three-fourths of a god. ![]()
__________________
A mi no me importa nada Para mi la vida es un sueño |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|