Which decade has the better music? (metal, rock, favorite bands, albums) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: which decade has the better music?
before 60s 3 1.44%
60s 28 13.40%
70s 37 17.70%
80s 51 24.40%
90s 45 21.53%
present 45 21.53%
Voters: 209. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-26-2007, 09:06 PM   #561 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
I don't really understand how or even why...since the 60s was one of the most fruitful time for indie labels.
Lol. Because I know it was a good time for indie labels so I made a derisive comment about their state that I didn't really mean. Maybe that's being ironic. I'm too lazy to look it up.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2007, 09:16 PM   #562 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProggyMan View Post
Lol. Because I know it was a good time for indie labels so I made a derisive comment about their state that I didn't really mean. Maybe that's being ironic. I'm too lazy to look it up.
Um...I'd call it being deliberately stupid.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2007, 09:53 PM   #563 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: new hampshire
Posts: 191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProggyMan View Post
I was being sardonic.
@Urban: Alright they were pretty damned big. They still didn't release they're debut until the 70's. But you weren't disputing that I suppose.
'70

just barely
Gates_of_Iscariot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2007, 09:57 PM   #564 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

Well, it's black and white so it doesn't really matter. And anyway, Led Zeppelin's debut was in 69 and yet they're a 70's band.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2007, 10:04 PM   #565 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
under's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,056
Default

well they had a debut in '69 that was not really a huge hit until the next year so thats why they are considered a 70's band.
under is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2007, 10:50 AM   #566 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by awriterslastresort View Post
well they had a debut in '69 that was not really a huge hit until the next year so thats why they are considered a 70's band.
You are aware it had pre-orders for 50,000 copies before it was even released , and when it did it spent over 70 weeks in the charts in both the U.S. and the U.K. ?

That doesn't sound like something that's 'not a huge hit until the following year' to me.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2007, 12:03 PM   #567 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
You are aware it had pre-orders for 50,000 copies before it was even released , and when it did it spent over 70 weeks in the charts in both the U.S. and the U.K. ?

That doesn't sound like something that's 'not a huge hit until the following year' to me.
I think he's trying to pretend Black Sabbath was actually released in 1969 or something.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2007, 12:18 PM   #568 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

He was talking about Led Zeppelin
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2007, 03:11 PM   #569 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
under's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,056
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
You are aware it had pre-orders for 50,000 copies before it was even released , and when it did it spent over 70 weeks in the charts in both the U.S. and the U.K. ?

That doesn't sound like something that's 'not a huge hit until the following year' to me.

well ok, sorry, i didnt really mean to say that it wasnt a huge hit. it was. but the following year more people got into it. more than there was the year before. so i guess i was trying to say is that it became an even bigger hit the year after (though that usually happens with bands anyway)
under is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2007, 03:22 PM   #570 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada Eh?
Posts: 6
Default

Every decade had some good tunes, but i think the 70's or 80's was the best.
__________________
Reddie1337 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.