live music vs recorded music

~~bungalow~~ · 01-19-2006, 05:30 PM

You always agree...

sleepy jack · 01-19-2006, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bungalowbill357

You always agree...

Would you rather I post the exact same thing she said, except with different words?

~~bungalow~~ · 01-19-2006, 05:31 PM

Yes.

mosesandtherubberducky · 01-19-2006, 05:35 PM

I would say live is better, because it can have those extended songs (not like the Allman Brothers) and covers. When I saw The White Stripes, Jack went into a slide solo out of nowhere and it was great. But if the band sucks live then studio is better. I guess that is just common logic.

boo boo · 01-19-2006, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by one_more_atrocity

iagree with the part how bands sound better in the studio cus if you listen to the album version of thesong and then hear the same song done live the album is far better but your not taking into account the experience of live music which, although not as good or usually as precise as a studio song actually standing there in the crowd can not be beaten by just slaping on an album in your bedroom, so i would go for live.

I have been to some concerts, i couldnt stand the noise, i literaly had to cover my ears the whole time, too loud for me.

I have OCD and i have claustophobic tendencies, so i also have a problem with large groups of people.

Muzak Geek · 01-19-2006, 10:10 PM

I'd have to say that it totally depends on the band - Although, in general, I enjoy listening to artists live more than I do a CD… I think it allows you to appreciate the creation of the music more when you see it performed in front of you.

I don't necessarily subscribe to the idea that certain genres sound better in the studio - due to lack of being able to reproduce studio "wizardry", tricks, or whatever. I've seen lots of so-called "studio bands" (Radiohead, Gradaddy, Pink Floyd, Yes, etc.) who put on fantastic live shows, and sound just as good live (if not better) than on CD. If the band sucks live, then to me that just says that all that "studio wizardry" I heard on their CD was nothing more than a producer's cover-up for a mediocre band or artist.

PaWp_tarHTs · 01-19-2006, 10:23 PM

studio is good. but when a band is simply amazing live, there's nothing like that. Some bands, like black sabbath, actually sound BETTER live in my opinion. which is really weird. Especially when you hear a solo and you're like "there's no way your fingers would fall off" then you see it happen. also the studio sometimes gives the illusion of this thing called "talent". if you can't pla it live, then don't play it. i've seen this too often.

fidelityfiend · 01-20-2006, 10:12 PM

and remember y'all - the artists get PAID for playing live. CD sales pay the lawyers and the Execs - not the artists!!!!!

bzbee · 01-29-2006, 07:50 PM

Studio recordings for sure for most music. The exception being artists like Kurt Cobain who's music was so much based on raw emotion. For artists like that, I find the live experience is often better.

**Scarlett O'Hara** · 01-29-2006, 10:24 PM

Live is the shizzle, it's louder, hotter and it's just damn wicked.

01-19-2006, 05:35 PM	#14 (permalink)
mosesandtherubberducky butt say x Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: so i read the question as "Where YOU live" which was kinda funny instead of "Where you live" Posts: 1,649	I would say live is better, because it can have those extended songs (not like the Allman Brothers) and covers. When I saw The White Stripes, Jack went into a slide solo out of nowhere and it was great. But if the band sucks live then studio is better. I guess that is just common logic. __________________ Can I have a youtube video for a sig? There's a thing that says "Wrap [YOUTUBE] tags around selected text"

01-19-2006, 10:10 PM	#16 (permalink)
Muzak Geek Music Addict Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Wake Forest, NC Posts: 87	I'd have to say that it totally depends on the band - Although, in general, I enjoy listening to artists live more than I do a CD… I think it allows you to appreciate the creation of the music more when you see it performed in front of you. I don't necessarily subscribe to the idea that certain genres sound better in the studio - due to lack of being able to reproduce studio "wizardry", tricks, or whatever. I've seen lots of so-called "studio bands" (Radiohead, Gradaddy, Pink Floyd, Yes, etc.) who put on fantastic live shows, and sound just as good live (if not better) than on CD. If the band sucks live, then to me that just says that all that "studio wizardry" I heard on their CD was nothing more than a producer's cover-up for a mediocre band or artist. __________________ Up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, B, A, Start… Just because we use cheats, doesn't mean we're not smart.

01-19-2006, 10:23 PM	#17 (permalink)
PaWp_tarHTs Groupie Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Virginia Posts: 8	studio is good. but when a band is simply amazing live, there's nothing like that. Some bands, like black sabbath, actually sound BETTER live in my opinion. which is really weird. Especially when you hear a solo and you're like "there's no way your fingers would fall off" then you see it happen. also the studio sometimes gives the illusion of this thing called "talent". if you can't pla it live, then don't play it. i've seen this too often. __________________ Hai bambini? Da Mangiare? "it's not rape, it's surpise sex."- Nick

01-20-2006, 10:12 PM	#18 (permalink)
fidelityfiend Music Addict Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Tampa FLA Posts: 80	and remember y'all - the artists get PAID for playing live. CD sales pay the lawyers and the Execs - not the artists!!!!! __________________ is it 4:20 yet?

01-29-2006, 10:24 PM	#20 (permalink)
Scarlett O'Hara Make it so Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 6,181	Live is the shizzle, it's louder, hotter and it's just damn wicked. __________________ "Elph is truly an enfant terrible of the forum, bless and curse him" - Marie, Queen of Thots

01-19-2006, 05:30 PM	#11 (permalink)
~~bungalow~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Hot-lanta Posts: 3,140	You always agree...

01-19-2006, 05:31 PM	#13 (permalink)
~~bungalow~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Hot-lanta Posts: 3,140	Yes.

01-29-2006, 07:50 PM	#19 (permalink)
bzbee Groupie Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 14	Studio recordings for sure for most music. The exception being artists like Kurt Cobain who's music was so much based on raw emotion. For artists like that, I find the live experience is often better.