Nevermind, let's talk about the same handful of bands that suck ad nauseum

TheCunningStunt · 12-28-2010, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by s_k

Just what I thought.
But it's pretty hard to find something to represent 'suck' without... You know.

s_k · 12-28-2010, 09:02 PM

Saw that one coming.

~~someonecompletelyrandom~~ · 12-28-2010, 11:36 PM

Finger vacuum? Idgi.

The Fascinating Turnip · 12-29-2010, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by s_k

Just what I thought.
But it's pretty hard to find something to represent 'suck' without... You know.

Refer to SATCHMO's post.

Don't mess with the pros gentlemen.

SATCHMO · 12-29-2010, 02:37 PM

I don't really think that The Beatles suck.

**Janszoon** · 12-29-2010, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SATCHMO

I don't really think that The Beatles suck.

I do.

Well, relative to their reputation at least.

~~someonecompletelyrandom~~ · 12-29-2010, 02:40 PM

They clearly don't suck. At all. In any capacity.

Why haven't people stopped giving a frock about how other people talk about a band? Most of you don't let other's negative opinions about a band influence you, why do their positive ones?

**Janszoon** · 12-29-2010, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conan

They clearly don't suck. At all. In any capacity.

Yes. Yes they clearly do.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conan

Why haven't people stopped giving a frock about how other people talk about a band?

Well, when a band is supposedly The Greatest Band Ever In The History Of Anything but are in fact just mediocre, it's hard to ignore the vast chasm between expectation and reality. It's kind of like going to a five star hotel and finding out the accommodations are more like two star.

Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra · 12-29-2010, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon

Yes. Yes they clearly do.

Well, when a band is supposedly The Greatest Band Ever In The History Of Anything but are in fact just mediocre, it's hard to ignore the vast chasm between expectation and reality. It's kind of like going to a five star hotel and finding out the accommodations are more like two star.

I wouldn't call them mediocre. I'd say they were mediocre live performers, and when they were a rock band they were a mediocre rock band. When they became strict studio composers, then they were legends. Albeit, I tend to make this point very very repetitively.

Still though, Apart from the song, Help was a pretty sucky album, and at the end of their pre-Rubber Soul days they did suck pretty badly.

**Janszoon** · 12-29-2010, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skaligojurah

I wouldn't call them mediocre. I'd say they were mediocre live performers, and when they were a rock band they were a mediocre rock band. When they became strict studio composers, then they were legends. Albeit, I tend to make this point very very repetitively.

I would call them mediocre. To my ear they have a couple decent songs and that's really it.

12-28-2010, 09:02 PM	#862 (permalink)
s_k Music Addict Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 2,206	Saw that one coming. __________________ Click here to see my collection

12-28-2010, 11:36 PM	#863 (permalink)
~~someonecompletelyrandom~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,538	Finger vacuum? Idgi.

12-29-2010, 02:37 PM	#865 (permalink)
SATCHMO Al Dente Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Texas Posts: 4,708	I don't really think that The Beatles suck.

12-29-2010, 02:40 PM	#867 (permalink)
~~someonecompletelyrandom~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,538	They clearly don't suck. At all. In any capacity. Why haven't people stopped giving a frock about how other people talk about a band? Most of you don't let other's negative opinions about a band influence you, why do their positive ones?