Nevermind, let's talk about the same handful of bands that suck ad nauseum - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Nevermind, let's talk about the same handful of bands that suck ad nauseum Nevermind, let's talk about the same handful of bands that suck ad nauseum
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
Page 21 of 76 « First 111920 21 22233171 Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2010, 05:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
DeathBreath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: A hot place
Posts: 106
Default
Linkin Park..yup, they definitely make it here.
DeathBreath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 05:41 PM   #2 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
Default
Babylon?

Or Bathroom Wall?
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 05:51 PM   #3 (permalink)
Ba and Be.
 
jackhammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
Default
EDIT and delete soon!
__________________

“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
jackhammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 09:38 PM   #4 (permalink)
Engorged Member
 
sidewinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,536
Default
Avenged Sevenfold sucks. And I'm tired of seeing that thread title bolded.
__________________
last.fm | my collection on RYM | vinyl instagram @allthatyouseeandhear
I'd love to see your signature/links too, but the huge and obnoxious ones have caused me to block all signatures.
sidewinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 01:15 PM   #5 (permalink)
MB quadrant's JM Vincent
 
duga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,762
Default
^

He's making that other fat guy in the back look really fit.
__________________
Confusion will be my epitaph...
duga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 07:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
Groupie
 
jspaceman009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 14
Default
I've read this whole thread and I'm still confused... most people seem to think a band sucks, just because they think it's "cool" to say so. Alot of the bands mentioned have been extremely popular during their time(s), so they must be doing something right.

Beatles, Stones, Who, Santana, Zeppelin.... these are all Hall of Fame bands
Green Day... Grammy Award Winners
Nickelback... Platinum selling artist
Motley Crue, Poison... Icons of their genres

I'm not saying that justifies acceptance into your record collection, but you can not deny that talent must account for their success.

Ignorance and hate to musical artists that physically do you no harm is kinda weird. It's just sound and rhythms with (in most cases) words attached.... nothing more, unless you're listening to your Judas Priest vinyl backwards.

Maybe some should look at it like this... If the bands mention in this thread are that bad and truly suck, then those who judge should be able to, without a doubt, produce audio-art that is of higher quality. Right?

Let's hear your multi-platinum selling album... or just your newest single will do fine.
jspaceman009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 07:46 PM   #7 (permalink)
MB quadrant's JM Vincent
 
duga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,762
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspaceman009 View Post
I've read this whole thread and I'm still confused... most people seem to think a band sucks, just because they think it's "cool" to say so. Alot of the bands mentioned have been extremely popular during their time(s), so they must be doing something right.

Beatles, Stones, Who, Santana, Zeppelin.... these are all Hall of Fame bands
Green Day... Grammy Award Winners
Nickelback... Platinum selling artist
Motley Crue, Poison... Icons of their genres

I'm not saying that justifies acceptance into your record collection, but you can not deny that talent must account for their success.

Ignorance and hate to musical artists that physically do you no harm is kinda weird. It's just sound and rhythms with (in most cases) words attached.... nothing more, unless you're listening to your Judas Priest vinyl backwards.

Maybe some should look at it like this... If the bands mention in this thread are that bad and truly suck, then those who judge should be able to, without a doubt, produce audio-art that is of higher quality. Right?

Let's hear your multi-platinum selling album... or just your newest single will do fine.
You know music taste is based on opinion, right? Ever heard the expression, "One man's trash is another man's treasure?"

If I think a band sucks, then it is because that is my honest opinion. If you don't, feel free to explain why. That is why this thread is here.

edit: Though if you are going to defend Nickelback, expect some nasty comments.
__________________
Confusion will be my epitaph...
duga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 07:45 PM   #8 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
DeathBreath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: A hot place
Posts: 106
Default
It's all based on opinion though.
Opinions are mostly fine. Especially musical ones, when it's all based on personal taste.
DeathBreath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 08:44 PM   #9 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Insane Guest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 1,322
Default
Yup that's pretty much the right thing to say. Green Day, might be Grammy Award Winners, they might not suck in an exact definition, but many people dislike them.

For example, The Beatles might be one of the most influential bands, but I still dislike them. To restate duga's phrase:
What you think is golden, might be viewed as **** to someone else.
Insane Guest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2010, 04:53 AM   #10 (permalink)
Groupie
 
jspaceman009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 14
Default
^ fair enough... you guys have good points. I do agree that everyone DOES have an their right to an opinion. That's why we have so many types of music. It's just that the majority of posts failed to describe why they disliked an artist...

By simply saying something or anything sucks, while it is the individual's "right", to say it just sounds ignorant... that's all. No offense.
jspaceman009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 21 of 76 « First 111920 21 22233171 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.