|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-24-2011, 02:37 AM | #23 (permalink) | |
Stoned and Jammin' Out
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern California; Eugene, OR; mobile
Posts: 1,602
|
Quote:
Just in case... I know I listened to an album or two before, like last year maybe... |
|
07-09-2012, 05:01 PM | #25 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 6
|
Converge's "Jane Doe"
Released in 2001, this album was trend setting for the decade, it could be representitive of the huge influence "metalcore" had from 2000-2005, and also the branches the genre took into all other forms of metal from 2005-2010. From progressive metal, to sludge, and to the blends in between during the rise of popularity during the decade of 2000-2010, all seems to have progressed from Converge's "Jane Doe".
My Top 3 Favorite tracks: 1. Hell To Pay 2. Homewrecker 3. Jane Doe Opinions on the album?? |
07-09-2012, 05:18 PM | #26 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
|
I wish I could say it was a worthless album, but it spawned so many retarded offspring I can't do that. It's an idiotic album, a poorly conceived album, and a poorly executed album, but it's not worthless. Why you put metalcore in quotes, however, is beyond me - they're a metalcore band. Yeah, the genre has become nearly universally derided, but this doesn't give fans an excuse to pretend the Converge and other bands in the genre are anything but metalcore.
__________________
Have mercy on the poor. |
07-09-2012, 07:20 PM | #27 (permalink) | |
Dibs on the killing sound
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Spider Scull Island
Posts: 366
|
Quote:
|
|
07-09-2012, 11:50 PM | #29 (permalink) | |
Dibs on the killing sound
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Spider Scull Island
Posts: 366
|
Quote:
I will admit that perhaps petty was a bad choice of wording but I stand by the metaphor. |
|
07-11-2012, 12:47 AM | #30 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
|
Quote:
****, I'm sorry - I was under the misunderstanding that on a site dedicated to discussing music, I could pretend that - you know - **** that offended my sense of good taste could be considered flawed, whereas **** that I liked could be considered good. .... Regarding the nonsense about "THE landmark album of a genre" - really? I'm supposed to pretend something is quality, regardless of how I feel about it, because it's popular with a particular group of people?
__________________
Have mercy on the poor. |
|
|