Because people don't understand subjectivity, whilst ironically using subjectivity as their only argumentative tool.

True, but also i feel like Jay Z v Nas topic has been milked out so much that eventually what is their to talk about it? but anyway these would all need different topics since books are not related what so ever

lol

So if I think Steve Jobs was a terrible businessman, it becomes fact that he was a terrible businessman?

This, can't believe people are arguing against it.

Goofle earlier in the thread you said Jay-Z is more interesting musically and I said he wasn't. So does that mean he is and isn't since we both think he is and isn't?

This is not my first exchange where he's been like this. He's more concerned with asserting his dominance than actually having a good discussion.

All of this seems like its based on opinion. its like they are clashing and we cant come to a medium

Yeah but I could quite easily have said Jay-Z is terrible at the start of this thread, I don't listen to his music and I think he's a massive knob. I didn't say it cos isn't the point to have a fair discussion? Whatever I think doesn't change whether he's good or not.

I never said Jay-Z was terrible, Jans thinks he is. Subjectivity.

How people think that an individual's subjective opinion does not necessarily have to be correct unless it coincides with their own subjective opinion bemuses me.

and i think that is the point we all need to understand