|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
![]()
Well yeah but there's still a version that has its place, just a narrow place. I don't use it in real life mostly because A.) I got scared off from using it for years for reasons of being a mildly good person and B.) there are way too many ****ing people around who I'd be worried about taking my using to mean that I'm disparaging gays just like they do. But on a fairly liberal internet forum where homophobes are run off or marginalized I don't really worry about contributing to a homophobic environment, and if some people think it is a homophobic environment then I think they're misinterpreting the culture here. We're not homophobes. We're just *******s.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: livin wild
Posts: 2,179
|
![]() Quote:
The "language changes over time" argument is a strange one as well. Using a hateful words in a hateful manner (especially knowing its connotations) and then just claiming a tamer version is not how a definition would fluidly change. It's not using it as an insult at all that would eventually do this, but w/e it's a hill weirdos are willing to die on for some reason. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) |
blasphemous krucifixion
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: seattle
Posts: 142
|
![]()
Id be less flippant if my response wouldn't be just posting what I said but saying it stupider for them. Following their train of thought we all need to go back to an 1800s dictionary and stop all this evolving nature of language nonsense that's been going on forever. It just doesn't make sense. The antiquated definition of a word doesn't negate what it means today. Saying it does is silly.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
Fck Ths Thngs
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
|
![]()
Yeah, because words are constantly evolving and they don't evolve when nazis like you demand they can only be used in one way and never change.
Also, stupider isn't a word but since I know what you meant by it I understand what you mean. That's the beauty of language. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) | |
blasphemous krucifixion
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: seattle
Posts: 142
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) | |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) | |
Fck Ths Thngs
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
|
![]() Quote:
Same for every other word in existence. If you and I are having a conversation and discuss beforehand(and agree) that when I say "x" it means "y", it doesn't matter how the word is commonly used, definitions only describe common usage they are not the end all be all of meaning. Words have no intrinsic meaning. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) | |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|