|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-11-2010, 03:57 PM | #251 (permalink) |
love will tear you apart
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Manchester, UK.
Posts: 5,107
|
Do they? Loads of albums I've seen, they've given a crap score to.
Really good albums as well, Rolling Stone seem shit but I pay very little attention to stuff like that. But they don't seem to hand out 5 stars all the time. |
11-11-2010, 05:12 PM | #254 (permalink) |
love will tear you apart
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Manchester, UK.
Posts: 5,107
|
It's surprising, more than anything.
They have given 3/5 and 3.5/5 for really great albums and I've never really seen them give a 5/5 for an album that's not The Velvet Underground & Nico, or other obvious greats. I expect it to be quite average, but we'll see. I've grown to dislike Rolling Stone more than Pitchfork in recent times. |
11-11-2010, 05:20 PM | #255 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
|
Rolling Stone will give a mediocre score to something that turns out to be groundbreaking and recieve critical praise and then they'll bump it to five stars and include it on their 500 Greatest Albums List.
Pitchfork just wants attention so they'll give any popular album or anything by a big-name artist a piss-poor review just because. In conclusion, they're both hopelessly ignorant music journals that everyone (fake hipsters and fun-loving 20 somethings aside) sorta know are a big joke. |
11-11-2010, 05:30 PM | #257 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
|
They're the only ones I seem to agree with a majority of the time (of course it's not like it's their job to agree with me). They write pretty informative reviews and are usually very sincere. The only thing that bugs me is they'll sometimes rave about an album in the actual review and then give it like 2.5 or 3 stars out of 5... what's up with that?
|