Just because I like the casualties that doesn't mean they rock to everybody, TO me they rock in my scene because I am into them, To you the casualties might not rock because maybe you dont like them.

'your ****ty poppy music' sums it up really. You have no other viewpoint but your own....and peanut brain....you don't even know me, you cuss people on the internet (that you don't know) with an extreme lack of justification. Am i to assume this is due to years of abuse from people that know you?

'they are the best street punk band' thank you, and goodnight everybody

Yeah, so when's this one getting banned?

LOL! Jesus!
Jees, punkrocklove, you are clearly obsessed with the Casualties and think you are punk.
I just read through 3 pages of you calling people facist pigs and have come to a conclusion.
You love a guy who walks around all screw the government, and claims to be punk rock with his, spikey hair and leather jacket, and you are trying to be something you are not!
Punk is not walkng around spitting out someone elses material
funny, you say you were into punk for 13 years....
funny you only named off one band (Dead Kennedys) that were around before then.
and all the punk bands otherwise you say are "punk" are only like 5 years old, in the Case of Green Day(but they are really popular to beginners)
me thinks you are LYING!!!
let's ban this loser!
Fenix, Jesus, Hookers!
let's get her!
and I swear, if you call Urban anything you little bitch I will whoop your ass from here back to the google search you did on "how to be a punk"

:ar_15s: kick her ass anarchy doll!!!!!!!! :ar_15s:

the casualties and ramones are the first bands i heard in the ol days so i still the casualties are still cool!

Casualties, Rancid, Total Chaos and the majority of the "street punk" bands have lost alot of their credibility in the scene, its just a fact even if they do have some good songs. most punks see these guys as jokes or post card punks as we like to call them. Dont get me wrong, I like alot of street punk bands older albums, hell i own albums by each of the bands Ive listed and still give them a spin every now and then. I was a street punk when i was a teenager and it was a fun experiance, and i remember when it became obvious that bands like these were only feeding the stereotype of punks as nothing more than a bunch of rowdy drunks with funny hair. I like more substance in my punk. Its like comparing Sex Pistols to Crass, on one hand you have these guys that fit the punk look, and on the other hand you have the punks that want nothing to do with the look and instead focus on the matters at hand. What side do you think Casualties fall under? I think its pretty obvious.

well, put Fenix.....but where do you fit the Pistols into that?
they had the look, and focused on the matters at hand to me...but that's me...I love the Pistols...so yeah,

the sex pistols were kinda like the "spice girls" of the punk rock world. They were created by Malcolm McClaren (their manager) to be marketed (successfully) by getting them gigs where he knew there was going to be controversy and media, when they brought in Sid Vicious to play bass he was only a fan and didnt know how to play but had the image, reputation and heroin habit to add more controversy (therefore getting more media exposure).. Both The Clash and The Damned were playing at this time and were the first punks in my opinion that focused on music rather than the style of clothes that was growing in popularity. Alot of Crass songs mention how the Sex Pistols were given the punk rock title because of the way they looked and how quickly they became popular, and I just happend to agree with them. Not trying to bust your bubble or nothing, just pointing out the similarities between the pistols and bands like the casualties.