![]() |
Sex Pistols - Spunk vs. Never Mind the Bollocks
For those who don't know, Spunk is a bootleg album by the Sex Pistols suspected by many to have been masterminded by Malcolm McLaren for... reasons. It was recorded roughly the same time as Never Mind the Bollocks, released one month earlier, and has many of the same songs, making it sort of a de facto co-debut album.
So how does it stack up to the official debut, brosephs? I can never decide tbh. NMtB either gave more time for Johnny Rotten to get his parts right or they were recorded later after he'd developed his persona further because he's noticeably sharper and more commanding than on Spunk, which is a big win since Rotten is such a large part of the band's appeal. But Spunk wins mostly on the music and production. I know when recording Bollocks that the producer wouldn't let the band members play at full volume and to make up the difference they layered the instrumental parts to give them more oomph, leaving them feeling stiff and kind of weird, whereas Spunk sounds like how the Sex Pistols probably should have sounded on wax. And musically Spunk also wins due to the presence of original bassist Glen Matlock. There's a noticeable swing and energy to the songs on the bootleg which is reduced on Bollocks which was recorded with guitarist Steve Jones. Surprisingly enough it seems that taking out a band's main songwriter has a negative effect on that band's sound. The last consideration is the track listing. Aside from track order the albums are very similar, but with Spunk you're missing out on "Holiday in the Sun" and "Bodies", the first of which is a fine Pistols tune but not quite top shelf, but "Bodies" is fantastic and a real loss if you go with the bootleg. But Bollocks is missing "Satellite" and "Just Me", both of which are pretty fantastic, so I guess that's a slight win for Spunk (especially if you're listening to the 11-track version of the debut that's missing "Submission"). And so I'm left stumped again. Do I love Johnny Rotten's insanity more than I love the rest of the band? I mean I definitely do tbh, and I have way more nostalgia for Never Mind the Bollocks, so I guess I'll skip the coin flip and just go with that. It's a close call though. Spunk - Spotify Never Mind the Bollocks - Spotify |
You make some good points. The thing is, I grew up with only one of those records in my collection. Never Mind the Bollocks is the record that’s imprinted on my mind. It’s almost like asking who do you like better yourself or the parallel universe version of you. The production, the layering, the energy all went unchallenged forever so that’s it. I like to consider myself open minded but it’s impossible for me to see this objectively. Another analogy: the dog I raised or the one that escaped a few weeks in.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Okay so my copy of Never Mind the Bollocks is a burned version that I downloaded song by song back in the days of Kazaa and at least "No Feelings" is clearly a different version than the only version I can find on the internet, both on Youtube and pirated versions, and I can't even find the version I grew up with and no it's not from Spunk.
Does anybody know what I'm talking about? It might not be the only song on my version that was different but I'm not sure. If I had anything but my Chromebook that can't take CDs I'd burn my version of "No Feelings" for reference but I'm boned atm. |
Oh and upon being finally too fed up with this discrepancy to live with myself I had to order the actual album cause I'll not be like that. But I also have a different "edition" from all of you so I'm officially better.
|
Remember being so exited going up to London to get the Spunk bootleg when it first appeared. Was a big open secret at the time. I see it as an alternative view, same as the Clash CBS demos.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:09 AM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.