|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-25-2010, 01:06 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Horribly Creative
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
|
Basically, they could`ve dragged anybody up there to take over Glen Matlock`s role. Despite not being able to play bass properly, he was pretty much as useless as they come. His saving grace was that he kind of looked good and his versions of "Something Else" and "My Way" are memorable.
|
10-25-2010, 01:08 PM | #12 (permalink) | |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,483
|
Quote:
|
|
10-25-2010, 01:09 PM | #13 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
Quote:
In essence, the Sex Pistols were not about technical virtuosity. His talent was however supplementing the image, and sound in which they were going for. Didn't say so directly in my rant, but I believe it was implied. Even if his talent was garnering freak attention and being a scuzzbag, image was EXTREMELY important to the Sex Pistols, moreso than the actual music element they were presenting. Which I guess I can't completely defend but still... he was there for a reason. Taking in what the Sex Pistols were, and what they needed, he was rather fit for the job. Last edited by Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra; 10-25-2010 at 01:16 PM. |
|
10-25-2010, 01:32 PM | #14 (permalink) | |
Horribly Creative
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
|
Quote:
The covers are memorable, because the singing was bad as only Sid Vicious knew how. For that reason, they are disticntly memorable and unmistakingly his. |
|
10-25-2010, 01:43 PM | #15 (permalink) |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
I wouldn't even say it was his image that benefited the pistols. The image stuff came much much later.
It was his unpredictability, his spontaneity. The fact that you never knew what he was going to do next. He bought tension & explosiveness to their gigs. So what if he couldn't play, you think I'd want to see the Happy Mondays without Bez? or Hawkwind without Stacia? Worrying about musicianship is something you need to do for albums, when it comes to playing live it's all about the performance & Sid for all his faults never failed on that aspect.
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
11-04-2010, 06:21 AM | #16 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
I agree Sid Vicious was talentless. |
|
11-04-2010, 06:58 AM | #17 (permalink) | |
Horribly Creative
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
|
Quote:
As for how the Sex Pistols would`ve continued after "Never Mind the Bollocks" nobody will ever know, as the vast majority of the stuff on "The Great Rock n Roll Swindle" were mostly covers or songs sang by somebody else and there was never ever any real follow up album to Never Mind the Bollocks. I think Steve Jones had some talent and some of the best songs off "The Great Rock n Roll Swindle" were written by him and the song "Lonely Boy" is probably his best. He also put out one or two good songs in his day with the Professionals a long forgotten band he`d formed with Paul Cook. |
|
|