a top 100 punk bands list.

LoathsomePete · 02-01-2010, 10:40 AM

Now I don't claim to be an expert on the genre, time and time again I've tried to co-mingle in it only to be expelled (often violently) due to my metal roots. After reading that list I have to say... I don't really see anything wrong with it. Perhaps the order is a little fucked but at least good bands are on that list. Most of my experience with ordered rankings like that horrible to say the very least (see Rolling Stone's list of 100 albums of the decade), but at least this list doesn't just skim the most popular albums. Punk is one of those genres that's so flooded with bands that it's nearly impossible to find everything you like. Good stuff unfortunately gets buried under others and finding a record store with a varied punk library is rare these days.

Vancouver · 02-01-2010, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoathsomePete

Now I don't claim to be an expert on the genre, time and time again I've tried to co-mingle in it only to be expelled (often violently) due to my metal roots. After reading that list I have to say... I don't really see anything wrong with it. Perhaps the order is a little fucked but at least good bands are on that list. Most of my experience with ordered rankings like that horrible to say the very least (see Rolling Stone's list of 100 albums of the decade), but at least this list doesn't just skim the most popular albums. Punk is one of those genres that's so flooded with bands that it's nearly impossible to find everything you like. Good stuff unfortunately gets buried under others and finding a record store with a varied punk library is rare these days.

The last time I looked at a Rolling Stone top 100 list they were using "Greatest Hits" records...ugh...

jaheredudes · 02-02-2010, 05:12 PM

im kinda pissed agent orange wasn't on this list but sonic youth was. Really?

almauro · 02-09-2010, 04:59 AM

I checked the list and can't find the crust. No Amebix, Nausea or Tragedy? That's wrong.

~~James~~ · 02-14-2010, 09:31 AM

Patti Smith and the Buzz****s should be way higher

Vancouver · 02-14-2010, 12:32 PM

^^ ya I DO NOT get the Buzz****s rating.

storymilo · 02-14-2010, 01:07 PM

The Adverts probably should have been higher, and Less Than Jake was on there lulz.

The Abracadaver · 02-15-2010, 01:42 PM

This list is so stupid. Kid Dynamite at 50? **** meeee. My top 20 at least. I mean, some of the list makes sense but some of it is...bleh.

BTown · 02-15-2010, 03:22 PM

how the **** does Pennywise and Less Than Jake get in front of The Germs?
And having NOFX and The Dropkick Murphys beating Minutemen AND Husker Du is insane.

Are the Descendents actually not on there or did I miss them?

Insane Guest · 03-11-2010, 03:54 PM

Misfits anyone? I think they deserve #1.

02-01-2010, 10:40 AM	#1 (permalink)
LoathsomePete Cardboard Box Realtor Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Hobb's End Posts: 7,648	Now I don't claim to be an expert on the genre, time and time again I've tried to co-mingle in it only to be expelled (often violently) due to my metal roots. After reading that list I have to say... I don't really see anything wrong with it. Perhaps the order is a little fucked but at least good bands are on that list. Most of my experience with ordered rankings like that horrible to say the very least (see Rolling Stone's list of 100 albums of the decade), but at least this list doesn't just skim the most popular albums. Punk is one of those genres that's so flooded with bands that it's nearly impossible to find everything you like. Good stuff unfortunately gets buried under others and finding a record store with a varied punk library is rare these days. __________________ Last.FM 101 Albums That May Not Change Your Life, But I Really Like And You Might Too

02-09-2010, 04:59 AM	#4 (permalink)
almauro Way Out There Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 850	I checked the list and can't find the crust. No Amebix, Nausea or Tragedy? That's wrong. __________________ rock n music blog

02-14-2010, 12:32 PM	#6 (permalink)
Vancouver Music Addict Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 188	^^ ya I DO NOT get the Buzz****s rating. __________________ http://www.last.fm/user/VancouverFlanke The face is familiar but I can't quite remember my name.

02-15-2010, 01:42 PM	#8 (permalink)
The Abracadaver Music Addict Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Indiana Posts: 88	This list is so stupid. Kid Dynamite at 50? **** meeee. My top 20 at least. I mean, some of the list makes sense but some of it is...bleh. __________________ Just five dollars to see a face explode, To see a man strung up by his throat! Come one! Come all! If you look close enough you'll see death's machinery exposed!

02-15-2010, 03:22 PM	#9 (permalink)
BTown super cool Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Pittsburgh Posts: 806	how the **** does Pennywise and Less Than Jake get in front of The Germs? And having NOFX and The Dropkick Murphys beating Minutemen AND Husker Du is insane. Are the Descendents actually not on there or did I miss them? __________________

02-02-2010, 05:12 PM	#3 (permalink)
jaheredudes Groupie Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 22	im kinda pissed agent orange wasn't on this list but sonic youth was. Really?

02-14-2010, 09:31 AM	#5 (permalink)
~~James~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Scotland Posts: 4,483	Patti Smith and the Buzz****s should be way higher

02-14-2010, 01:07 PM	#7 (permalink)
storymilo Music Addict Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,845	The Adverts probably should have been higher, and Less Than Jake was on there lulz.

03-11-2010, 03:54 PM	#10 (permalink)
Insane Guest Music Addict Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: CA Posts: 1,322	Misfits anyone? I think they deserve #1.