|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-31-2010, 08:49 PM | #13 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
I'm fully aware that I rail against this constantly, but this comment is why I hate punk music.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
01-31-2010, 09:10 PM | #14 (permalink) | |
one big soul
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,096
|
Quote:
It always pisses me off when I see a band like Rancid or The Casualties donning this gear as if it somehow destroys all doubt that these guys are the real deal when in reality, a band like Comeback Kid or Kid Dynamite can dress like normal people and fit into the genre of music just as well.
__________________
|
|
01-31-2010, 10:02 PM | #15 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
I don't think I know another genre though that constantly throws people out quite like punk does.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
02-01-2010, 07:26 AM | #16 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 207
|
Quote:
The world will never agree on what's punk and what isn't. That's the curse, but also part of the fun of the genre. |
|
02-01-2010, 10:26 AM | #17 (permalink) | |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
Quote:
Part of the fun, you're saying? Well heres the thing. There is an on-going purity test in punk and the worst of it is, its not even centralized. Its constantly being readjusted as 2+ people speak. its like religion post-pope. the problem is the genre never evolves and it isolates would be listeners. Therefore there is no lead in "starter bands" for punk within the genre. It suggests people either are listening to punk, or they aren't. While I can't say the opposite is better - metal with its forever disseminating sub genres to the point of self-parody - but theres progression in other forms for a reason. i.e. bands can't have touches of "speed" and "lack of talent." So a band that plays fast isn't punk. A band that plays three chords isn't punk. Its like the shire, one day you just stumble upon it and at that point you know what it is. Prior it was just something you'd heard about.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
|
02-01-2010, 11:19 AM | #18 (permalink) |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
This list is why I prefer post punk.
I don't have to put up with morons with no taste who think Bad Religion & Operation Ivy are among the 5 best bands in their chosen genre.
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
02-01-2010, 11:40 AM | #20 (permalink) |
Cardboard Box Realtor
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hobb's End
Posts: 7,648
|
Now I don't claim to be an expert on the genre, time and time again I've tried to co-mingle in it only to be expelled (often violently) due to my metal roots. After reading that list I have to say... I don't really see anything wrong with it. Perhaps the order is a little fucked but at least good bands are on that list. Most of my experience with ordered rankings like that horrible to say the very least (see Rolling Stone's list of 100 albums of the decade), but at least this list doesn't just skim the most popular albums. Punk is one of those genres that's so flooded with bands that it's nearly impossible to find everything you like. Good stuff unfortunately gets buried under others and finding a record store with a varied punk library is rare these days.
|
|