Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen

The two bands are not directly comparable. You might as well be comparing Led Zep and Caravan, or at least it makes about as much sense as this, which is none. Nirvana was a death rock band with mainstream pop credentials, who focused on making 'big' songs with a depressive/sombre feel. Pixies on the other hand (regardless of label affiliations) were basically indie punk. They focused on making quick songs that gave short bursts of dark though generally upbeat pop. The only thing the bands have to tie them together is the fact that Kurt Cobain was heavily influenced by Pixies, which is attested by his frequent use of the quiet-loud dichotomy (e.g. Smells Like Teen Spirit) that can be found in Pixies songs like Tame. Neither is really 'better' than the other, as there is no criteria by which to properly compare them. Better for what? If it's writing big hard-hitting rock tracks then Nirvana blow Pixies out the water.

Originally Posted by Unknown Soldier

Despite the decent argument that you are putting out. The Pixies and Nirvana are very comparable especially since Nirvana were heavily modelled on the Pixies. The comparison between Led Zep and Caravan was not a great analogy. As brilliant as the Pixies were, I`d still sooner listen to a Nirvana album.

Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen

it's Nirvana hands down for me. Even though I love Doolittle, and rather like Surfer Rosa.