The Pixies vs Nirvana - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Punk
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Which band is better?
Pixies are way better 67 23.93%
I prefer The pixies 62 22.14%
I like them about the Same 40 14.29%
I prefer Nirvana 56 20.00%
Nirvana is way better 55 19.64%
Voters: 280. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-12-2011, 01:54 PM   #1 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
AgeOfOddz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatSvenster View Post
...Yeah and they're both great songs so where's the complaint? I hate it when people say "Oh x sounds a lot like x so all their songs sound the same". It's a stupid argument.
I´m not really complaining as much as i´m comparing the two bands...
And you can´t call my argument stupid if you completely disregarded it. I was pointing out how much of Nirvana´s material in my opinion sound´s the same. Which i think makes them sort of a redundant act, hence why i choose The Pixies as the superior band. Oh well, cheers for people having divided opinions i suppose.
AgeOfOddz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 01:00 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
Zer0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,792
Default

There are plenty of noticeable differences in style and sound between Nevermind and In Utero. Nevermind has a glossier production while In Utero is rawer-sounding and has more of a live feel to it. In Utero features more dissonant guitar tunings and deep down-tuned bass, giving the album a more abrasive sound, while the guitars on Nevermind sound more tuneful and punchier. In Utero also has a darker and more aggressive feel to it and is less pop-influenced compared to Nevermind. I can't really imagine a song like 'Serve The Servants' fitting in on Nevermind, likewise I can't imagine 'Drain You' fitting in too well on In Utero.
__________________
Zer0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 01:59 PM   #3 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zer0 View Post
There are plenty of noticeable differences in style and sound between Nevermind and In Utero. Nevermind has a glossier production while In Utero is rawer-sounding and has more of a live feel to it. In Utero features more dissonant guitar tunings and deep down-tuned bass, giving the album a more abrasive sound, while the guitars on Nevermind sound more tuneful and punchier. In Utero also has a darker and more aggressive feel to it and is less pop-influenced compared to Nevermind. I can't really imagine a song like 'Serve The Servants' fitting in on Nevermind, likewise I can't imagine 'Drain You' fitting in too well on In Utero.
I agree with everything, except I'm not "too sure" about the raw & live sounding aspect of Utero. That would depend on the individual really. Its too Pop.. to sound "Live" and the "Raw" aspect goes to the album "Bleach".
In my opinion the Darker and Aggressive (Punk) feel is "dominate" in all.. of Nirvana music Personality.

I agree both albums are different in sound and style though. "Actually", just (a little) different.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 05:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Necromancer View Post
I agree with everything, except I'm not "too sure" about the raw & live sounding aspect of Utero. That would depend on the individual really. Its too Pop.. to sound "Live" and the "Raw" aspect goes to the album "Bleach".
In my opinion the Darker and Aggressive (Punk) feel is "dominate" in all.. of Nirvana music Personality.

I agree both albums are different in sound and style though. "Actually", just (a little) different.
I definetly would agree with the notion that in utero is still fairly poppy. (favorite nirvana album btw)
Odyshape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 02:10 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Zer0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,792
Default

Well maybe not live sounding but it does have a raw feel to it. Bleach is obviously their darkest and rawest album of course, but I was comparing Nevermind and In Utero since AgeOfOddz stated that there is no real difference between the two.
__________________
Zer0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2011, 09:55 AM   #6 (permalink)
FUNky
 
Violent & Funky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 2,482
Default

Maybe I'm just not a big enough Pixies fan, but I have a hard time remembering if one of their songs is on Surfer Rosa or Doolittle. The differences in production between those two albums isn't far off from the differences between the Nirvana albums...
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/ohio0808

sometimes I don't thrill you
sometimes I think I'll kill you
just don't let me fuck up will you
'cause when I need a friend it's still you
Violent & Funky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2011, 11:57 AM   #7 (permalink)
Buzz Killjoy
 
BastardofYoung's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,692
Default

Well, Dumb was written and being performed even before Nevermind was released. So it would fit in with Nevermind. First performance of the song was September 25th, 1990.

Songs from In Utero that were around before/around the time of "Nevermind"

All Apologies (1990)
http://www.livenirvana.com/songguide/all-apologies.html

Dumb (1990)
http://www.livenirvana.com/songguide/dumb.html

Pennyroyal Tea (1990)
http://www.livenirvana.com/songguide...royal-tea.html

Radio Friendly Unit Shifter (1991)
http://www.livenirvana.com/songguide...t-shifter.html

Rape Me (1991)
http://www.livenirvana.com/songguide/rape-me.html
__________________
last.fm

‎"I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people." - Jack Handey.

Last edited by BastardofYoung; 09-12-2011 at 12:12 PM.
BastardofYoung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2011, 09:42 AM   #8 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 19
Default

I like the Pixies better. Their music is more varied.
Siddi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2011, 12:49 PM   #9 (permalink)
Buzz Killjoy
 
BastardofYoung's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,692
Default

why is nirvana shitvana?

okay, i can see how some do like them, not something everybody enjoys personally, but to just call them shit is not right. They did have talent. Kurt, while he may have been a minimal guitarist in technique did have a god sense of melody, his vocals as well. He knew how to be simple but inject basic melody into his sound, he was good at composing poppy tunes that while yes, are basic and simple still suited the songs. Not every guitarist has to be a Eddie Van Halen, Jimi Hendrix or Micheal Angelo Batio... sometimes it is harder to write a simple song than it is to just shred and be technical.

Interested in hearing what reasons you have to dislike them. Interested in seeing what counters you have to my statement above.
__________________
last.fm

‎"I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people." - Jack Handey.
BastardofYoung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2011, 01:02 PM   #10 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

I'm not much of a fan of Shitvana but I'd still prefer them any day of the week over Shitgarden or Shit Temple Pilots.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.