|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Who was better? | |||
The Ramones | 64,000 | 99.81% | |
The Clash | 121 | 0.19% | |
The Sex Pistols suck (aka, never listened to either) | 3 | 0.00% | |
Voters: 64124. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-29-2010, 05:25 PM | #282 (permalink) | |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
Quote:
|
|
01-29-2010, 05:32 PM | #287 (permalink) |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
I don't know if the Sex Pistols "invented the politics in it" (most likely not) but they weren't one of the first punk bands so it's pretty hard to claim that they have any kind of monopoly on defining the fundamentals of punk.
|
01-29-2010, 05:43 PM | #290 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 188
|
Quote:
However what I consider punk (which isn't saying anything) was them. Nothing before that to me was. I'm not in the majority I know. Some before them sounded more punk than others. Some I can't get how they get the label. It felt like punk to me, sounded like punk, smelled like punk. Pere Ubu, Blondie, Television etc..sounded new to me...just not punk. |
|
|