Ramones vs. The Clash

indietrash3 · 01-24-2010, 07:12 AM

uh that's what I've been saying all along

Alfred · 01-24-2010, 09:56 AM

So what's the problem?

~~Sansa Stark~~ · 01-25-2010, 12:16 AM

They weren't typical "rock stars" you uneducated twat. They sold Sandinista! (three pieces of vinyl) at a single LP price, so their fans could afford it. They oversold Bond's Casino, and double booked so everyone would see them play. Rudi Peni is OKAY but they could never reach the level of the Clash, or be nearly as ****ing relevant, and I'm sure that get's on Blinko's nads. As for the Ramones, idgaf.

Sgt Pilcher · 01-25-2010, 02:43 PM

I would definitley say the Clash, I love the Ramones, but the Clash just did so much more with music. So I voted Clash.

loveissucide · 01-25-2010, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by indietrash3

either way Ramones' music is more charming than The Clash's quest for glory and fame.

So a discography consisting of endless regurgitation>one based on constant change and innovation?It's Oasis vs. Blur all over again.

duga · 01-25-2010, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loveissucide

So a discography consisting of endless regurgitation>one based on constant change and innovation?It's Oasis vs. Blur all over again.

so blur is the clash in this analogy, right? could be obvious...but i just want to make sure.

think tank > anything oasis ever did

Vancouver · 01-29-2010, 04:24 PM

Punk should make a statement. Clash used what they had to get messages across. Ramones never did that...unless sniffing glue was a message.

Can't compare the two in my mind.

**Janszoon** · 01-29-2010, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vancouver

Punk should make a statement. Clash used what they had to get messages across. Ramones never did that...unless sniffing glue was a message.

Can't compare the two in my mind.

Why should punk make a statement?

Vancouver · 01-29-2010, 05:17 PM

Otherwise you end up with mindless crap with no backbone. Don't get me wrong I'm guilty of listening to it. It's more of a general statement.

It's kinda what defines you as punk IMO. Something has too. I mean what some people consider punk now is unreal. It's how punk started and should be honored.

And no ..I don't think Ramones started it.

loveissucide · 01-29-2010, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vancouver

Otherwise you end up with mindless crap with no backbone. Don't get me wrong I'm guilty of listening to it. It's more of a general statement.

It's kinda what defines you as punk IMO. Something has too. I mean what some people consider punk now is unreal. It's how punk started and should be honored.

I though it was based on doing what you and only you felt like?
"Punk Rock means freedom" etc?

View Poll Results: Who was better?
The Ramones	64,000	99.81%
The Clash	121	0.19%
The Sex Pistols suck (aka, never listened to either)	3	0.00%
Voters: 64124. You may not vote on this poll

01-24-2010, 07:12 AM	#271 (permalink)
indietrash3 Groupie Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 45	uh that's what I've been saying all along __________________ Clickable link removed by mod.

01-24-2010, 09:56 AM	#272 (permalink)
Alfred one big soul Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Canada Posts: 5,096	So what's the problem? __________________ LAST.FM / VINYL COLLECTION / RYM

01-25-2010, 12:16 AM	#273 (permalink)
~~Sansa Stark~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: The Eyrie, Vale of Arryn, Westeros Posts: 3,234	They weren't typical "rock stars" you uneducated twat. They sold Sandinista! (three pieces of vinyl) at a single LP price, so their fans could afford it. They oversold Bond's Casino, and double booked so everyone would see them play. Rudi Peni is OKAY but they could never reach the level of the Clash, or be nearly as ****ing relevant, and I'm sure that get's on Blinko's nads. As for the Ramones, idgaf.

01-25-2010, 02:43 PM	#274 (permalink)
Sgt Pilcher Groupie Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Texas Posts: 23	I would definitley say the Clash, I love the Ramones, but the Clash just did so much more with music. So I voted Clash.

01-29-2010, 04:24 PM	#277 (permalink)
Vancouver Music Addict Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 188	Punk should make a statement. Clash used what they had to get messages across. Ramones never did that...unless sniffing glue was a message. Can't compare the two in my mind.

01-29-2010, 05:17 PM	#279 (permalink)
Vancouver Music Addict Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 188	Otherwise you end up with mindless crap with no backbone. Don't get me wrong I'm guilty of listening to it. It's more of a general statement. It's kinda what defines you as punk IMO. Something has too. I mean what some people consider punk now is unreal. It's how punk started and should be honored. And no ..I don't think Ramones started it.