|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Who was better? | |||
The Ramones | 64,000 | 99.81% | |
The Clash | 121 | 0.19% | |
The Sex Pistols suck (aka, never listened to either) | 3 | 0.00% | |
Voters: 64124. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-18-2009, 07:07 AM | #221 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 803
|
The thing is, I don't see Ramones to be as creative as The Clash, they just sound like a mix of The Beach Boys and New York Dolls. I don't understand how they can be considered an embodiment of punk (nor how their music can be considered punk in the first place).
Punk isn't about not giving a **** about anything, it's the attitude to want to change the world. I don't think the Ramones live up to that part. Last edited by The Monkey; 09-18-2009 at 07:13 AM. |
09-18-2009, 09:41 AM | #223 (permalink) |
Moodswings n' Roundabouts
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: At the corner of Dude and Catastrophe
Posts: 4,512
|
Punk is a hundred different things to many people. To me, writing a double album taking in various musical influences instead of carrying on with 3 chord rock songs is pretty damn punk.
|
09-18-2009, 09:45 AM | #224 (permalink) | |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
Quote:
I don't know where people get this idea that punk is about wanting to change the world. Of the original punk and protopunk bands I can't think of a single one that was about that. |
|
09-18-2009, 02:29 PM | #226 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,845
|
Quote:
|
|
|