|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Who was better? | |||
The Ramones |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
64,000 | 99.81% |
The Clash |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
121 | 0.19% |
The Sex Pistols suck (aka, never listened to either) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 0.00% |
Voters: 64124. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#18 (permalink) | ||
Da Hiphopopotamus
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 4,034
|
![]()
Really someone give me a reason why they suck other than the music I mean the Ramones weren't terribly creative in that area either.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by sweet_nothing; 04-08-2008 at 03:53 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#20 (permalink) |
A Dude
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 161
|
![]()
Well, punk has always been around, I think, but in terms of bands, I think punk's roots lie in stuff like the who and the doors, since that's who the Ramones were emulating. Just playing faster.
__________________
alive and well, i live to be alive, i live to always strive for something more. |
![]() |
![]() |
|