|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Who was better? | |||
The Ramones | 64,000 | 99.81% | |
The Clash | 121 | 0.19% | |
The Sex Pistols suck (aka, never listened to either) | 3 | 0.00% | |
Voters: 64124. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-02-2009, 07:33 AM | #112 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Could have something to do with The Clash being 10 times better.
|
06-02-2009, 03:38 PM | #114 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 114
|
The Clash!!!!!!
Ramones are awesome, but I just don't get a soundgasm when I listen to their stuff.
__________________
See when you put a shell to your ear, it is not the sound of crashing waves you're hearing, it's the amplified current of your bloodstream -SF |
06-06-2009, 10:23 AM | #115 (permalink) | |
Man vs. Wild Turkey
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 948
|
Quote:
I always thought that the Ramones kind of sucked. I know they were supposed to and everything, but that doesn't cut it for me. I've never liked junkies, and I've never liked noisy, annoying, skinny rock stars. I'm working class, all the way, and I reckon that's why I feel inclined to side with The Clash 100%. |
|
|