Isn't 'Pop-Punk' an oxy moron? (alternative, blues, rock, genre) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Punk
Isn't 'Pop-Punk' an oxy moron? Isn't 'Pop-Punk' an oxy moron? (alternative, blues, rock, genre)
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
Page 18 of 21 « First 81617 18 1920 Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-25-2008, 07:49 PM   #171 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
Dark Side Of The Moon? Are you kidding? Pink Floyd is close to being Post-Rock on that album.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 08:01 PM   #172 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
Uh, what are yours? DSOTM has moments of Pysch that could be considered very, very light 'hard rock, but really? Where?
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 08:04 PM   #173 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
That's a pretty stupid thing to say. So it's absolutely impossible that Pink Floyd came close to Post-Rock on DSOTM? I never even said they were Post-Rock.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 08:14 PM   #174 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
Post Rock: Rock instrumentation for non-rock purposes.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 08:32 PM   #175 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
Ok, that doesn't mean that bands outside of the original movement can't be close to or exactly like Post-Rock.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 08:36 PM   #176 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
I'm saying it doesn't only apply. You said that.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 08:45 PM   #177 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
Well there are certainly bluesy moments but I don' think any of it is very hard. I'm gonna' say bull**** on Blues Rock being a sub-genre of Hard Rock.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 08:50 PM   #178 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
But being hard isn't a prerequisite for Blues-Rock. Hence the bull****.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 09:17 PM   #179 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
Hard Rock is Blues-based, so if anything it's a Blues sub-genre.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 09:27 PM   #180 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default
I'm talking about Blues-Rock to. The Rolling Stones are Blues Rock, but not Hard Rock. Captain Beefheart is Blues Rock. As are tons of non-Hard Rock bands.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 18 of 21 « First 81617 18 1920 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.