Why do people call bands like Fall Out Boy and Good charlotte "Sellouts"? (singer, indie) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Punk
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-16-2008, 01:25 AM   #201 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default

The entire proposition of "selling out" is a ridiculous assertion and is an excuse for people who enjoyed a band prior to their genre shift/crappy album release to say "they used to be good." If you are seriously naive enough to follow such dogmatic bullshit, you need to pull your head out of your ass and see the music industry isn't as innocent as you saw it before.
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline  
Old 11-16-2008, 02:10 AM   #202 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_sam View Post
The entire proposition of "selling out" is a ridiculous assertion and is an excuse for people who enjoyed a band prior to their genre shift/crappy album release to say "they used to be good." If you are seriously naive enough to follow such dogmatic bullshit, you need to pull your head out of your ass and see the music industry isn't as innocent as you saw it before.
Completely disagree. It's perfectly intuitive and reflects actual fact:

- a band, on a small label, is renowned in the music community for being audacious, adventurous, creative, daring and innovative
- they then sign a massive multi-million dollar record contract
- their output subsequent to signing the new deal is entirely commercially driven and conforms to pretty much every convention of pop/mainstream currently existing in the present market
- plainly, though this would be quite an extreme case scenario, it is certainly "selling out".

Selling out, basically, should be understood to be changing something in your product in order to capitalize on the market. Short of this, there is no selling out. You're simply not selling out unless you modify something in your creative output in order to make more money.

For this reason, statements made in songs like Tool's "Hooker With A P3nis" are odd. The satirical idea that by simply making a record you have sold yourself out falls plainly outside of the spirit of what 'selling out' is conventionally understood to mean. There is a wide gulf of difference between merely selling your creative output, and changing your creative output to make it more 'sellable'. The LATTER is what anybody who talks of 'selling out' means by it. Thus, 'selling out', as with any other term, is to be judged on the basis of how it is conventionally defined.
Rainard Jalen is offline  
Old 11-16-2008, 02:44 AM   #203 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen View Post
changing something in your product in order to capitalize on the market
In all likelihood if a band did that I doubt they would care about the integrity of their own music in the first place.

I just grow despondent when people say "that band sold out" when they mean to say "their later albums showed a change in direction." It's like a hot button for idiots that like to insult a band without actually having to offer any logical reasoning.
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline  
Old 11-16-2008, 04:06 AM   #204 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_sam View Post
In all likelihood if a band did that I doubt they would care about the integrity of their own music in the first place.

I just grow despondent when people say "that band sold out" when they mean to say "their later albums showed a change in direction." It's like a hot button for idiots that like to insult a band without actually having to offer any logical reasoning.
That's very true actually. Like with Tool, for example - a lot of people claimed they sold out with 10,000 Days, just because it included two plausible Modern Rock Chart hits and people didn't like that. Truth was, there was no sign of selling out at all - they were just trying to mix things up a bit and make an album that had the progressive impulses of Lateralus, but with a little more melodic/songful sensibility.
Rainard Jalen is offline  
Old 11-16-2008, 12:23 PM   #205 (permalink)
"Hermione-Lite"
 
Arya Stark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New York.
Posts: 3,084
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_sam View Post
In all likelihood if a band did that I doubt they would care about the integrity of their own music in the first place.

I just grow despondent when people say "that band sold out" when they mean to say "their later albums showed a change in direction." It's like a hot button for idiots that like to insult a band without actually having to offer any logical reasoning.
Personally, I don't say that any bands... "sell out."

But I do think it means more than just changing the direction.

I feel that it means they began playing for the money rather than the music, therefore changing the direction of their focus AND music.

Do you disagree?

A little bit like Avril Lavigne and RJA. (Who are now both in Kohl's commercials.)

Red Jumpsuit Apparatus's singer is very egotistical in his ways, and gives off a very... "bow at my feet" presence. That's just my take of his attitude. >.<
Arya Stark is offline  
Old 11-16-2008, 12:26 PM   #206 (permalink)
____
 
FaSho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 5,279
Default

I think RJA are OKAY, and I like A FEW Avril songs, but I don't think they changed directions they just got steadily worse. Same with Paramore, who I still like.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
What? No. No. No. No no no.
FaSho is offline  
Old 11-16-2008, 12:28 PM   #207 (permalink)
"Hermione-Lite"
 
Arya Stark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New York.
Posts: 3,084
Default

I personally just got sick of Paramore.

But they're an amazing band.

I like Avril's old stuff.

But now she's just too... poppy and girly and *twitches*

RJA's e-mails give off the idea that they think there's nobody better than them.

I don't know.

I feel that they're good.

But not good enough to have such an idea as that one.
Arya Stark is offline  
Old 11-16-2008, 04:01 PM   #208 (permalink)
we are stardust
 
Astronomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,894
Default

C'mon, Avril was marketed from the start as the new image of a pop princess - one who is "punk" and "rebellious". They never really cared about the music that much, her image was just such a great opportunity.
__________________
Astronomer is offline  
Old 11-16-2008, 04:16 PM   #209 (permalink)
marquee moon
 
Roygbiv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cardboard adolescent View Post
screw you dookie pwns
But does American Idiot? I think that's his point.
Roygbiv is offline  
Old 11-16-2008, 04:40 PM   #210 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

No my point was they were shit when they started , they were shit then and they're still shit now .
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.