when will punk no longer be mainstream? (house, rock, punk-rock)

tjtech12 · 03-16-2007, 06:09 PM

nevermind. i was pissed but now i'm not.

tdoc210 · 03-16-2007, 06:14 PM

tommorow

PaperHurricanesAndPlanes · 03-16-2007, 07:06 PM

Lol. Bad Religion and Rise Against disagree. And, going mainstream is like going Black...you don't go back.

swim · 03-16-2007, 07:32 PM

Wait for it, wait. Now. DIY.

punk-4-life · 03-16-2007, 10:54 PM

in my oppinion punk going "mainstream" is a good thing (as long as the bands dont sell out ) because real punk has a message and the more people hear the message the more impact it will have....

PaperHurricanesAndPlanes · 03-16-2007, 11:21 PM

^ The guy who can't spell for has a good point.

Moon Pix · 03-17-2007, 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tjtech12

it seems like the message of so many bands has been deluded by mainstream audiences, and i'm hoping that punk will stop being profitable and that the cool kids will move on to the next big trend. is there a possibility of this happening soon?

I doubt you'd say that if you were in a band and had to wash dishes or work in McDonald's just to pay for rent and rehearsal time so you could do a band in the first place.

PaperHurricanesAndPlanes · 03-17-2007, 08:59 AM

What I think he meant was, it shouldn't give you limos and big houses, but they should be able to live off it.

enemyat_thesix · 03-17-2007, 10:45 PM

lolpunk

Kevorkian Logic · 03-19-2007, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaperHurricanesAndPlanes

Lol. Bad Religion and Rise Against disagree. And, going mainstream is like going Black...you don't go back.

Despite the whole going mainstream or whatever, I still enjoy to vitalize bad religion every once in a while, especially the Empire Strikes First. Plus I gained a lot of respect for the band, or at least Graffin, when I read an article about him about The New Atheism, he didn't come of like the typical over-exposed punk-rocker, which I found nice.

Ultimately I feel going "mainstream" is a case-by-case basis, usually in favor of the negative side though.

03-16-2007, 06:09 PM	#1 (permalink)
tjtech12 A Dude Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 161	when will punk no longer be mainstream? nevermind. i was pissed but now i'm not. __________________ alive and well, i live to be alive, i live to always strive for something more. Last edited by tjtech12; 03-17-2007 at 06:48 AM. Reason: i changed my mind

03-16-2007, 06:14 PM	#2 (permalink)
tdoc210 ashes against the grain Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: new hampsha Posts: 2,617	tommorow __________________ We went back there and they had come and hacked off every inoculated arm. There they were in a pile. A pile of little arms. And I remember... I... I... I cried. I wept like some grandmother. I wanted to tear my teeth out. I didn't know what I wanted to do. And I want to remember it. I never want to forget it. I never want to forget. And then I realized... like I was shot... like I was shot with a diamond... a diamond bullet right through my forehead. And I thought: My God... the genius of that.

03-16-2007, 07:32 PM	#4 (permalink)
swim dontcareaboutyou Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: North Carolina Posts: 5,188	Wait for it, wait. Now. DIY. __________________ http://nakednaps.bandcamp.com/

03-16-2007, 10:54 PM	#5 (permalink)
punk-4-life FUC K THE GOVERNMENT Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 214	in my oppinion punk going "mainstream" is a good thing (as long as the bands dont sell out ) because real punk has a message and the more people hear the message the more impact it will have....