|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Sex Pistols vs. Ramones | |||
Sex Pistols | 76 | 41.08% | |
Ramones | 109 | 58.92% | |
Voters: 185. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-23-2003, 10:25 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Punk Rocker
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 317
|
Sex Pistols vs. Ramones
Who do you punkers out there think is better?
__________________
Everyone has music in them. Only the talented have the ability to share it with the rest of the world. Here's a thought; let's stop labeling music and fighting over what genre a certain band is, and start listening to whatever pleases our ears no matter what anyone thinks of it! ;)
|
12-23-2003, 10:43 PM | #3 (permalink) |
Punk Rocker
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 317
|
Sex Pistols is what got me into punk music, I just wish I was born about 15 years earlier maybe I could have went to a show....
__________________
Everyone has music in them. Only the talented have the ability to share it with the rest of the world. Here's a thought; let's stop labeling music and fighting over what genre a certain band is, and start listening to whatever pleases our ears no matter what anyone thinks of it! ;)
|
02-12-2004, 04:11 PM | #5 (permalink) |
looking long'n'hard
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hampton London
Posts: 161
|
It has to be the Pistols.Listen to tunes like substitute,did you no wrong,sattelite,stepping stone,don't gimmie no lip child.These tracks are raw punk at its greatest.Unlike todays bands the original punks were seen as a threat to society.The pistols spearheaded the punk scene globaly and in my opinion have never been bettered
|
02-13-2004, 07:15 AM | #8 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 170
|
Because the Sex Pistols were ******* sellout drug addicts who did **** all to promote the punk scene and were doing what they did solely so they could support their next fix.
Not saying the Ramones weren't a bunch of glue sniffing dummies, but they weren't put together by some label dude with deep pockets. |
02-13-2004, 08:32 AM | #9 (permalink) | |
looking long'n'hard
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hampton London
Posts: 161
|
Quote:
The fact that the Pistols were formed before Malcom Mclaren (granted they didn't have a singer) seems to of escaped you to.Maclaren was no 'Dude with deep pockets' far from it he was eeking out a living in his clothes shop. Any band that you listen to has been 'funded' one way or another as an investment to someone,normally a record company. So tell me what bands you like that aren't drug taking,bank rolled w*****s? |
|
02-13-2004, 09:18 AM | #10 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 201
|
I don't like either of them. Sex Pistols because of what ol'e Jack said up there (sorry twotone, you're wrong) and the Ramones just because I don't like what they sould like. If i had to pick I would say Ramones just because they did do respectable things in the industry. Just my opinion.
|
|