Sex Pistols vs. Ramones (soundtrack, house, jazz, punk, rock) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Punk
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Sex Pistols vs. Ramones
Sex Pistols 76 41.08%
Ramones 109 58.92%
Voters: 185. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2007, 11:17 PM   #161 (permalink)
dontcareaboutyou
 
swim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,188
Default

I'm talking big picture. Past 30 years of who's efforts have gone farther. Immediate impact is Ramones but the back lining of what makes hardcore special[for me at least] is the parts of it that lean more towards the Husker Du influence and such. The parts that are experimental and make you say wow.

My point was that there was a band who could write and had big impact and was in the same scene at the same time. The main reason why I even said anything was because they don't get enough respect. I mean you hadn't even heard of them.
__________________
http://nakednaps.bandcamp.com/
swim is offline  
Old 01-27-2007, 11:24 PM   #162 (permalink)
;)
 
cardboard adolescent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 3,503
Default

Wire certainly does deserve more respeck. But then, so does Pere Ubu. And countless other post-punk bands and various other scattered experimental bands that have been forgotten over time.
cardboard adolescent is offline  
Old 01-28-2007, 07:20 AM   #163 (permalink)
In a very sad sad zoo
 
Moon Pix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: "Out on tour with Smashing Pumpkins, nature kids, they don't have no function"
Posts: 363
Default

They were both influencial. Equally influencial on bands that followed.

Neither of them influenced me.
__________________
There’s a dream that I see, I pray it can be
Look 'cross the land, shake this land - "Maybe Not", C. Marshall
Moon Pix is offline  
Old 01-28-2007, 12:26 PM   #164 (permalink)
In a very sad sad zoo
 
Moon Pix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: "Out on tour with Smashing Pumpkins, nature kids, they don't have no function"
Posts: 363
Default

The biggest influence on punk rock was the fact that most of them could barely play their instruments. The lack of chops was more influencial than any band.
__________________
There’s a dream that I see, I pray it can be
Look 'cross the land, shake this land - "Maybe Not", C. Marshall
Moon Pix is offline  
Old 01-28-2007, 12:37 PM   #165 (permalink)
Pepper Emergency!
 
Strummer521's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moon Pix View Post
The biggest influence on punk rock was the fact that most of them could barely play their instruments. The lack of chops was more influencial than any band.
True...but of course, The Ramones were the first to go ahead and play with a total disregard for their utter lack of skill and experience. They kind of showed others you didn't need chops...just the will to pick up and play. The commonly accepted year that punk really broke through as a widespread genre was '77, yet they had their first record out in '76. Johnny Ramone has said that when they started they set out to be a bubblegum band...but then they became essentially the flagship band of Legs McNeil and the other founders of Punk magazine, the publication which brought the term into widespread use, and was possibly the first place the word punk was used to describe a style of music.
Strummer521 is offline  
Old 01-28-2007, 12:43 PM   #166 (permalink)
In a very sad sad zoo
 
Moon Pix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: "Out on tour with Smashing Pumpkins, nature kids, they don't have no function"
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strummer521 View Post
True...but of course, The Ramones were the first to go ahead and play with a total disregard for their utter lack of skill and experience.
In a rock band context yes but the Godz and the Shaggs were making a racket years before the Ramones. Their stuff couldnt be called punk though, it couldnt be called anything.
__________________
There’s a dream that I see, I pray it can be
Look 'cross the land, shake this land - "Maybe Not", C. Marshall
Moon Pix is offline  
Old 01-28-2007, 01:04 PM   #167 (permalink)
Imperfectly Perfect
 
Kevorkian Logic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moon Pix View Post
They were both influencial. Equally influencial on bands that followed.

Neither of them influenced me.

This isn't about who influenced you, no one cares about if they influenced you are not. It's about which is the better band and that is the Ramones.
__________________
"it is only through a limitless accumulation of the imperfect that a certain type of perfection can be attained"
Kevorkian Logic is offline  
Old 01-28-2007, 01:43 PM   #168 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

I`d say musically they were about equal. Although I would have given it to the Pistols had Cook & Jones not been so under the thumb with McLaren towards the end and let Lydon use the songs that eventually ended up on the first P.I.L album instead of that f*cking awful film soundtrack.

Although the Ramones were around first it should be noted that the Pistols achieved more in their first 6 months than the Ramones did in 6 years.
The Ramones needed what was happening in the UK to establish themselves.The Pistols managed it by themselves.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline  
Old 01-28-2007, 07:07 PM   #169 (permalink)
In a very sad sad zoo
 
Moon Pix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: "Out on tour with Smashing Pumpkins, nature kids, they don't have no function"
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strummer521 View Post
True...but of course, The Ramones were the first to go ahead and play with a total disregard for their utter lack of skill and experience. They kind of showed others you didn't need chops...just the will to pick up and play.
One thing thats often surprised me is that free jazz isnt mentioned ver often when refferring to pre-punk music. If you listen to the guitars solos by a lot of the bands that actually used them you begin to hear similarities between those and the sax solos you might hear on a John Coltrane album, lots of notes that don't fit into the songs key and just a very chaotic sound. Its pretty much the same idea as free-jazz soloing.

Black Flag is a good example of this.
__________________
There’s a dream that I see, I pray it can be
Look 'cross the land, shake this land - "Maybe Not", C. Marshall
Moon Pix is offline  
Old 01-28-2007, 07:13 PM   #170 (permalink)
;)
 
cardboard adolescent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 3,503
Default

Basically, you have to draw a line as to how far back you're going to trace it. I'd call Trout Mask Replica a proto-punk album, and all they did was take free jazz aesthetics and apply it to rock n' roll. From there you could trace it back to Coltrane and Coleman and all those crazy cats, but is there really a point? I mean, Stravinsky was one of the first to include atonal and abrasive passages in his music, but I wouldn't really say The Rite of Spring was a proto-punk symphony...
cardboard adolescent is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.