No Pink Floyds "light show" was better because they could actually play music. Didn't need LSD to make Floyd work.

this blows away Pink Floyd.
http://www.kissfanshop.de/KissTours/77f.jpg

yeah if you're f*cking deaf

Apparently they played a handful of gigs with bands like Blatz and Filth, so... there you go.

The Kiss stuff should be moved to the designated thread.

which is a real thorn in your side, isn't it tonto???

:love:

http://www.kissfanshop.de/KissTours/79e.jpghttp://www.kissfanshop.de/KissTours/79f.jpg

it simply dwarfs the Pink FLoyd trampoline in lights as far as influencial stage show goes.
the pics prove it aint an opinon, but a fact

alright, LAST TIME I will attempt to explain this to you.

KISS did not influence any band in any significant way.

Their music was not NEARLY innovative enough to be significant.

Their stage shows were based on concepts that, as MANY people hve pointed out, HAD BEEN DONE BEFORE, by the stones, pink floyd etc etc.

It doesn't matter IN THE LEAST IF KISS had better lights shows, or bigger explosions, because the fact remains, that THEY WERE NOT THE FIRST ONES TO DO IT. If KISS hadn't have done their lights shows the way they did, some other band would build on what the bands before them had done in their place. FLOYD was more influencial in that sense because THEY DID IT FIRST.

FUCK it's not a hard concept.

promise??? (hey, didnt Motley just play Calgary?? did you go??

Do you get a stage show when you listen to Kiss at home on cd?

What then?