|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-01-2023, 07:35 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
|
Frippin' Out: Trollheart's First-time Exploration of King Crimson's Music
Frippin' Out: Trollheart's First-time Exploration of King Crimson's Music Having given many of you reason to sharpen your blades and look up the easiest ways to dispose of a body with my whining "I don't get seventies Yes" thread, I came across this from a few years back and thought I'd prod you a little further. I only ended up doing a few albums, so I'll repost those and then I'll carry on from there. Prepare to be annoyed! Note: I originally used my colour coding on those reviews so I'll continue to do so. For those who are unaware, forgot or don't care, these are the keys: Blue = Fantastic, perfect, wonderful, top class etc Green = Excellent but not quite perfect; still really really good Brown = Okay; certainly has a lot going for it but a few flaws or things I don't like or that could be better Grey = Meh. Nuff said. Red = Bad. Don't like this at all. In the Court of the Crimson King (1969) So this is where it all starts, huh? Well, I actually did eventually listen to this album, when it came up on the list for my History of Prog journal, and was very very impressed. But I haven't listened to it since, so though this won't be the first time I'm listening to it, it will be slightly new to me. I see they're already being mavericks at this point. They have multi-part suites, but unlike Genesis for instance who would use numbers to differentiate the parts a few years later, or indeed the Moody Blues, who just broke up the tracks, to say nothing of others (whose name at present escapes me) who used letters, King Crimson take a leaf out of fellow proggers Van der Graaf Generator's book, and simply call the track by its main name, noting that it “includes” other songs, such as with “Epitaph (including March For No Reason and Tomorrow and Tomorrow)". Of course, I'm only going by Wiki and I don't know if this is how the track listing is shown on the actual albums, as mine aren't physical copies. Only five tracks, but the album still clocks in at a relatively impressive 44 minutes. So let's break this puppy down, shall we? 1. 21st Century Schizoid Man (Including Mirrors): Heavy, powerful start to the album, with what sound like almost Beefheartian vocals. Sure, others copied these, but at this time I doubt anyone else was emulating the bold Captain. Maybe it's a vocoder? Not sure. Anyway, it's quite heavily psychedelic with a lot of jazzy elements thrown in, and you can already hear a band that's tighter than me at the pub. Serious skills here.. 2. I Talk to the Wind: A lovely change into a soft, lush ballad. Really relaxing and just gorgeous. Lake's vocals are very soothing here, in contrast to the slightly manic tone of the opener. 3. Epitaph (Including March For No Reason and Tomorrow and Tomorrow): Hmm. Seems to be another ballad, with some fantastic orchestral stuff in there and guitar that pulls at your heart at times. Sublime. 4. Moonchild (including The Dream and the Illusion): The real epic here, coming in at just over twelve minutes, part of which (I assume the aforementioned “The Dream”) is sort of atmospheric, ambient instrumental music which really gets very quiet, though you can hear a lot of strange little sounds. Xylophone? Maybe a vibraphone? Touches on the piano. Susurrating percussion, all very almost surreal. 5. In the Court of the Crimson King (Including The Return of the Fire Witch and The Dance of the Puppets): I'm sure there's little I can say about this that hasn't already been said. The powerful vocals on the chorus, the sort of medieval atmosphere created, the flutes, the extended instrumental ... pure magic. Result: Well as expected I loved it, but then that's hardly the revelation I'm looking for, since as I already said, I've heard this once before. Only gets better with the second listen though. I am a little surprised (pleasantly) by how laid back most of it is. Hopefully the rest of the discography can keep up this extremely high bar. Oh, and this is the first time I've really heard drumming I can say is something special. One other thing that really hits me about this album is how really advanced it must have been for its time. When you consider what Genesis and Yes were doing around this time, well, this knocks both into a cocked hat. Like I said, magic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OvW...J1i7UKj0aGfy0U
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 Last edited by Trollheart; 04-10-2023 at 01:03 PM. |
03-01-2023, 08:02 PM | #2 (permalink) |
AllTheWhileYouChargeAFee
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,178
|
Greg Lake had one of the best singing voices of any rock star.
__________________
Stop and find a pretty shell for her Beach Boys vs Beatles comparisons begin here |
03-02-2023, 04:44 AM | #3 (permalink) |
Aficionado of Fine Filth
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: You don't want to look in there.
Posts: 6,896
|
|
03-09-2023, 08:08 PM | #5 (permalink) |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
|
In the Wake of Poseidon (1970) Okay so here's where it really kind of begins for me. After the debut there is not a single Crimson album, or track, that I've heard (shut up) so all of this will be new to me. 1. Peace – A Beginning Just a quick a capella intro, less than a minute. Not much to say about that. 2. Pictures of a City (Including 42nd at Treadmill): Very jazzy, comes in very powerfully and has a nice groove. Melody and rhythm kind of reminds me of early Sabbath to a degree. Fripp breaks out the guitar magic about three minutes in and the track takes off. Does go a little too improvisational at the end though. 3. Cadence and Cascade: No problem with this one. Lovely little gentle ballad in a kind of Moody Blues vein. Lovely piano, lovely vocal harmonies, sweet flute. 4. In the Wake of Poseidon (Including Libra's Theme): The moment that organ starts I'm in love with this song. Kind of puts me in mind of my boys VDGG, like something off H to He or maybe Aerosol Grey. Also again a very Moodies influence, or maybe that should be the other way around? Whatever. Great track anyway. 5. Peace – A Theme: Again, just a short little instrumental. Nice for what it is. 6. Catfood: I can't place my finger on it; there's just something about this I don't like. It reminds me of the worse tracks by Spock's Beard that make me unsure whether or not I will ever like them as a band. No, not into this one at all. Actually the ending is good, but that's about it. 7. The Devil's Triangle (i) Merday Morn (ii) Hand of Sceiron (iii) Garden of Worm: An eleven-and-a-half minute instrumental? This better be good. I read that it's based around Holst's “Mars” but that his estate wouldn't allow them to use it so they had to kind of disguise it. I can hear it, but had I not read that I don't think I would have made the connection. Hmm. Oh no wait: I definitely would. I hear it clearly now. Takes a while to get going, but then there's plenty of time I guess. It's quite funny in a way: Fripp saying “so we can't use your music? Well **** you: we'll make it so close to it that it'll really piss you off without being legally actionable!” Reminds me of that Simpsons episode where Homer says “How much are we getting paid for this?” referring to the story of Bart's life, and Marge says “the producers changed it just enough so that they wouldn't have to pay us!” Heh. Loving this at the moment I must say; high point of the album. Very cleverly done, shows real skill to skate that close to the edge (pun intended) without falling over. Like the addition of the chorus to “In the Court of the Crimson King” thrown in there. Overall, a definite ten out of ten here. 8. Peace – An End: Bit of a hippy ending with a short almost a capella piece though the acoustic guitar and the vocal harmonies that come in are nice. Result: Nowhere near as good as the debut, though to be fair I hadn't expected it to be. To follow up such an instant classic inside a year would have been asking a lot. Still, I'm a little more underwhelmed by this than I had thought I would be. There's more on it that I don't like than I anticipated, though the good tracks do outweigh the bad. I feel it doesn't quite hold together the same way ITCOTCK did, that it's perhaps a little disjointed? Don't know, but overall not as impressed this time round. Still good, even great, just not, for me, a classic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDC6...UApfin2R8Rbcav
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
03-09-2023, 08:14 PM | #6 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
Ja it has its moments and great songs but they didn't really stick the landing from the debut albumwise until Lark's Tongue In Aspic
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
03-15-2023, 09:21 AM | #8 (permalink) |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
|
Lizard (1970) Looks like Crimson managed to release two albums in one year six years before Genesis did the same, though at this point it seems Greg Lake has ****ed off to become the “L” in ELP, so we're left with a guy whose singing I have to say I don't much dig. Well, we'll see how he his. This is what they call a transitional album, they tell me. 1. Cirkus (Including Entry of the Chameleons): Starts off deceptively slow and relaxed but quickly kicks into life, and reminds me again very much of VDGG. Some really nice horns and what sounds like orchestral strings here. Pretty decent track but I wouldn't be raving about it. 2. Indoor Games: I may have pinpointed – at least with this album – why I'm finding it a little harder to get into Crimson than I expected, and it hinges on those jazzy horns. VDGG use this style a lot too, and though I do like them, there are a lot of their albums I can't get into because they're too jazz-slanted for me. This song is just ok, nothing special. A bit boring if I'm perfectly honest. The stupid laughing at the end is particularly annoying. 3. Happy Family: More discordant jazz, god damn it. I really do not like this guy singing. What's his name? Oh yeah: Gordon Haskell. Well, **** him. I've yet to hear anything on this album that's going to make me like it. At best this is a meh but it's verging towards a Hate. 4. Lady of the Dancing Water: At least we finally get a ballad, which is nice, but what the **** is with Haskell? It's like listening to a Gumby try to sing. Hope he ****ed off after this album. I doubt I'm going to enjoy anything here, even this, when the enormous drag factor of his singing has to be taken into account. 5. Lizard (a) Prince Rupert Awakes (b) Bolero – the Peacock's Tale (c) The Battle of Glass Tears (i) Dawn Song (ii) Last Skirmish (iii) Prince Rupert's Lament: This multi-part suite runs for a total of twenty-three minutes and change, and I assume took up the second side of the album, and I have to admit it's speaking to me a whole lot more than anything on this record previously. Maybe it can be salvaged after all. Yeah, this is not only streets but city blocks ahead of what has gone before. Much of that is, to be fair, down to the fact that most of it is instrumental so I don't have to listen to Haskell, though again to be fair, when he did sing on the opening part he wasn't bad. I prefer Lake though. As far as this track (side?) and the rest of the album go though, night and day. Result: I'd have to say a pretty damn big disappointment. Although the second side/epic suite/last track saves the album, up to that point there's nothing really there for me. At all. The last track is good, but more in a sort of “at least it's not as bad as the rest of the album” way rather than a “**** me how have I been missing this for so long?” kind of way, which is what I'm pretty much still waiting for. Bar the debut, of course. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpZs...Itwu0kvN2AAn8n
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
03-29-2023, 11:12 AM | #9 (permalink) |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
|
Well so far we've had an album that apparently even Fripp himself hated (until Steven Wilson came to save the day, it says here) and now one that is seemingly the weakest of their career up to this point. Don't think this one is going to change my current mindset on them, but let's give it a go anyway.
Islands (1971) 1. Formantera Lady: Came and went without leaving the slightest impression on me. Boring as all hell. 2. Sailor's Tale: A little better, bit of excitement in it, but still nothing much to get excited about. 3. The Letters: Starts off very low-key and quiet, then explodes into a VDGG hornfest (oooer!) but it's still not gripping me. Yawn. 4. Ladies of the Road: A boring, annoying attempt at hard rock on an album that doesn't quite know what it wants to be. 5. Prelude: Song of the Gulls: Nice little almost classical instrumental, the first track on this album I've given a **** about. Very enjoyable. Beautiful, in fact. A welcome respite from the tedium this album is weighing me down with. 6. Islands: Okay this is also very nice. I'm not wild about this third vocalist either (seems he, and everyone else, left after this album anyway) but the sax from Mel Collins is very easy on the ear, and it's a really nice relaxing tune. Result: Basically pretty disappointing, though reading about it I had kind of expected this. Nothing will bring me back to this album again, so currently we're at a 2/2 split in terms of albums by King Crimson that I liked and didn't like. I see though that what is apparently widely accepted as the trilogy of their best work is up next, so maybe things will take an upswing. At the moment, they couldn't drop any further.
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
04-10-2023, 01:01 PM | #10 (permalink) |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
|
Larks’ Tongues in Aspic (1973) This is, then, where, if I don’t get it over these three albums, chances are I never will. The trio of albums released between 1973 and 1974, and preceding a seven-year hiatus, are universally acknowledged, apparently, as being their best work. So I guess this is the equivalent of Foxtrot, Nursery Cryme and Selling England by the Pound; I should love these albums, and if I don’t, well, maybe it’s a Close to the Edge deal for me, and I never will. I have to admit, reading quickly through about it, it doesn’t look like it’s going to move me on my sort of meh reaction to this band, their debut album excepted. It’s good to see this is where John Wetton and Bill Bruford joined up, but the old “e” word is there, as if the “jf” word, and while these albums may stand as the pinnacle of the band’s career (perhaps it might be more accurate to say, Fripp’s career) they may have to work to impress me. Let’s see what’s on the menu then. 1. Larks’ Tongues in Aspic, Part One: Nice slow fade-in mostly on strummed acoustic guitar, very relaxed, very low-key. Kicks up then on Fripp’s angry guitar with some very frenetic arpeggios from, um, whoever’s on the keys. Let’s see… right. Either David Cross or Fripp himself. Not sure why KC seem to need two drummers here, but given there’s a track called “The Talking Drum”, maybe I’ll see it. Overall good so far, though it hasn’t yet changed my mind about margarine (old Irish joke, shut up). Nice midsection with, is that cello or viola or violin or something? Certainly changes the composition. Seems to go completely silent in the tenth minute for several long seconds, then it comes back with the violin or whatever. Definitely have the impression of guys just ****ing around here. Experimental and sort of impressionist I guess. Not bad, but not really for me. 2. Book of Saturday: Nice little guitar theme on this, is that flute? Pleasant, nice little sort of ballad, but nothing more really. Doesn’t really register with me. Not much to it. 3. Exiles: A kind of drone opening, weird little sounds (“Frippertronics”?) and it all sounds very spacey and experimental, then it settles down into a nice little melody with some haunting violin. I would have to say Wetton’s vocals either seem very far down in the mix or are weak - and I know he’s not a weak singer - but either way they don’t add much here. Sound very hollow and far away; perhaps they’re meant to, I don’t know. Nevertheless, this is probably the best of the tracks so far. 4. Easy Money: A bit more energy in this, though it tails back then on sort of single guitar chords against Wetton’s vocal, which just sounds, I don’t know, hoarse to me? Bruford does come through well here (or is it Jamie Muir? Problem with having two drummers) and the percussion certainly drives the song. Good work from Fripp on the frets, but then, you’d expect that. At least Wetton’s vocal gets more powerful and audible near the end. The laugh at the end is very annoying though. 5. The Talking Drum: Sounds like traffic noises to me, or insects flying. I have no doubt whatsoever, with a title like that, and with both Bruford and Muir involved in the writing, that this will be basically a drum solo by any other name. Mind you, there’s a pulsing bass line coming up now from Wetton, quite funky in its own way and this is joined by Viola from Cross, so no, I guess I’m wrong. Guitar too of course, and this could in fact end up being the best instrumental on the album (of three), possibly edging close to the best track overall. Like this a lot. Could do without the screech at the end, otherwise very very good. 6. Larks’ Tongues in Aspic, Part Two: The final instrumental, the closer and the track that bookends the album with the opening part one, this is very almost psychedelic and pretty aggressive when it begins, but then slows down on violin and softer percussion into almost a precursor to Genesis’s Duke mixed with the best of the Alan Parsons Project. Paradoxically, given the supposed experimental/jazz nature of this album, most of which I agree with, this at least shows King Crimson coming closest to what I would term proper seventies prog rock. Result: While I would not say this album has changed my mind about the band, the second half of the album, if you will - the last four tracks - show where they really come into their own and begin to impress me. I wouldn’t call this a seachange album, and for much of its run the addition of John Wetton has little if any impact, but the compositions on the second side are far superior, in my view, to those on the first, and in that way it’s a definite stride forward. Not quite the revelation I had expected or hoped for, but a step in the right direction certainly. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtxF...M2JpsHofCulKv9
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
|