Favourite Genesis albums? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Prog & Psychedelic Rock
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Your favourite Genesis albums in order of preference
From Genesis to Revelation 4 11.11%
Trespass 5 13.89%
Nursery cryme 10 27.78%
Foxtrot 14 38.89%
Selling England by the pound 15 41.67%
The lamb lies down on Broadway 13 36.11%
A trick of the tail 7 19.44%
Wind and wuthering 4 11.11%
... And then there were three 3 8.33%
Duke 3 8.33%
Abacab 2 5.56%
Genesis 3 8.33%
Invisible touch 6 16.67%
We can't dance 1 2.78%
Calling all stations 1 2.78%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-18-2012, 10:55 AM   #31 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Duraddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 322
Default

Gabriel's songwriting suffered from naivety and an overblown ego. He refined himself and learned to take his time. Almost to a fault.

He was always quite poetic, but coherency was something he was not good at.
__________________
Quote:
“0h my g0d muzic sux n0w but im really c00l becuz i listenn to the beatlezzzz rip g00d muzic”
Duraddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 10:50 PM   #32 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: indoors
Posts: 722
Default

That gave me an interesting thought. Maybe Peter Gabriel gets too much credit for Genesis lyrics and his natural writing style was being made more "obtuse" to fit the band (my guess is that Tony Banks might have influenced that). For soon after Gabriel left, he wrote "Solsbury Hill," which is rather typical lyrically of his ongoing solo material (and a great song, if you ask me). According to Wikipedia, he wrote almost all the lyrics to The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway, but prior to that, most songs seem to have been group compositions.
sopsych is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 11:06 PM   #33 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Duraddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 322
Default

Gabriel's solo records and Genesis are two entirely different animals. I've always thought it odd.
__________________
Quote:
“0h my g0d muzic sux n0w but im really c00l becuz i listenn to the beatlezzzz rip g00d muzic”
Duraddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2012, 07:03 PM   #34 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
Default

Uh, why would it be odd? If an artist goes solo, the chances are that they want to spread their wings and tackle music/styles/themes/directions their parent band couldn't, or that they couldn't in their parent band. Not a whole lot of point in leaving to go solo and then churning out the same music you did in the band, is there?

Look at the music of anyone who's gone solo: Fish with Marillion. Neal Morse with Spock's Beard. Bob Catley with Magnum. Gilmour. Waters. Peter Hammill. All engaged in different types of music --- sometimes subtly, sometimes radically --- to that which they played within the bands they left. After all, you have to have a reason to go solo, and ego aside, that's often a case of "musical differences", which sometimes means that you want to play a certain style/genre or just way, that your bandmates don't.
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2012, 07:04 PM   #35 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard the Duck View Post
to be fair, though, Gabriel's lyrics are usually too obtuse to form a coherent and cohesive story

the only straightforward story I know is "The Cinema Show"
Yeah, I'll give you that. But then, what do you expect from a man who used to dress as a flower, and also a fox, onstage?
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2012, 11:01 PM   #36 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: indoors
Posts: 722
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
Uh, why would it be odd? If an artist goes solo, the chances are that they want to spread their wings and tackle music/styles/themes/directions their parent band couldn't, or that they couldn't in their parent band. Not a whole lot of point in leaving to go solo and then churning out the same music you did in the band, is there?
Tell that to Rob Thomas

I'm into mainstream artists, so I can't comment on the examples given. Let me compare Gabriel and Sting. They both left and started exploring different styles of music. Sting's lyrical style, however, didn't change much. Gabriel seems to have made an extreme change, from what little I know. I could also use Robert Plant as an example. I stick to my suspicion that Peter Gabriel didn't contribute as much to Genesis lyrics as is popularly thought.
sopsych is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2012, 11:32 PM   #37 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Duraddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
Uh, why would it be odd? If an artist goes solo, the chances are that they want to spread their wings and tackle music/styles/themes/directions their parent band couldn't, or that they couldn't in their parent band. Not a whole lot of point in leaving to go solo and then churning out the same music you did in the band, is there?

Look at the music of anyone who's gone solo: Fish with Marillion. Neal Morse with Spock's Beard. Bob Catley with Magnum. Gilmour. Waters. Peter Hammill. All engaged in different types of music --- sometimes subtly, sometimes radically --- to that which they played within the bands they left. After all, you have to have a reason to go solo, and ego aside, that's often a case of "musical differences", which sometimes means that you want to play a certain style/genre or just way, that your bandmates don't.
I agree to a point. But there isn't a single trace of his musical past on Peter Gabriel 1. It was like he just sprouted up out of nowhere.
__________________
Quote:
“0h my g0d muzic sux n0w but im really c00l becuz i listenn to the beatlezzzz rip g00d muzic”
Duraddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2012, 01:45 AM   #38 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duraddict View Post
I agree to a point. But there isn't a single trace of his musical past on Peter Gabriel 1. It was like he just sprouted up out of nowhere.

When he was in Genesis the band wrote music together, but when he was on his own he had control of the reins and done his own music - so it seem likely he would not have the same sound as Genesis.

Peter Gabriel era Genesis were playing music that was popular for Rock bands to play at the time. Still it was uderground music, it was heavy and more complicated than songs on the Pop charts. But they still did well with album sales.

He developed as an artist. When he was on his own he had more control over his music, and just like any one else his musical taste changed (along with everyone else in the decade).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards

Last edited by Neapolitan; 07-20-2012 at 01:59 AM.
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2012, 01:57 AM   #39 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan View Post
When he was in Genesis the band wrote music together, but when he was on his own he had control of the reins and done his own music - so I don't know why his solo music should sound like if the group Genesis or Tony Banks wrote it. Peter Gabriel era Genesis were playing music that was popular for Rock bands to play at the time. Still it was uderground music, it was heavy and more complicated than songs on the Pop charts. But they still did well with album sales.

He developed as an artist. When he was on his own he had more control over his music, and just like any one else his musical taste changed (along with everyone else in the decade).
more like "he degnerated over time, and his music got worse and worse"
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2012, 01:01 PM   #40 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Duraddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 322
Default

I think he stopped trying so hard. Which really worked for him.

Now he doesn't try at all, and I resent him for it.
__________________
Quote:
“0h my g0d muzic sux n0w but im really c00l becuz i listenn to the beatlezzzz rip g00d muzic”
Duraddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.