![]() |
I don't think of First Utterance as a prog album at all.
|
Quote:
|
I'm no genre genius, but I think of it as a psychedelic folk album.
|
I see it as progressive folk with heavy elements of rock, classical, medieval, and world music. Certainly isn't tame enough to be called psychedelic folk imo.
|
Quote:
edit : Quote:
|
Yeah but wouldn't it be hard to argue that First Utterance doesn't also fit the Progressive Rock bill?
RYM: Quote:
|
Quote:
edit : Just out of curiosity, I tried to find a little more information. I found an interview with Roger Wooten who is one of the Comus guys. Quote:
Source : http://www.prog-sphere.com/2010/08/2...wootton-comus/ |
Okay, Comusaholics, can we bring the conversation back to the original topic? I know you're all eager to discuss Comus, but I'd like to know if there are any more votes for the two albums, as this is currently the status: not a runaway success for Yes by any means, and a few more votes could really change the tide, either way.
Close to the edge - 4 Animals - 2 So, to quote Twelfth Night from "Creepshow" --- Anymore for anymore? Also, anyone with ideas for the next battle, don't be shy... |
Pile another vote on Close to the Edge. I've never understood the insane hype for Animals-- yeah it's a good album but it pales in comparison to Pink Floyd's more well-known stuff and even, I'd argue, Meddle. I don't find it very memorable, but CttE is just insanely fun to listen to. You've got a group of some very groove-oriented, very technically-skilled musicians all jamming together on three epic tracks-- every time I listen to the album I focus on a different musician and discover something new and titillating.
In Animals' defense, Waters' lyrics are much more engaging than Anderson's abstract(nonsensical) narratives. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:23 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.