![]() |
How is it misleading when there are prog elements throughout a lot of their albums, and not just including the fact that the members have prog backgrounds? Surely they could be considered a prog band. And I added in classic because they were creating music that some could consider classic rock.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
cheesy keyboards, simple chords, emptiness of any classical structure, no song cycles, no overall concept, no lengthy passages Asia is closer to a band like Europe than Yes as US has pointed out, prog bands have done AOR (it was a pretty popular thing for old prog bands to put out AOR albums in the early 90s), these include:- Yes - Talk Procol Harum - The Prodigal Stranger Jethro Tull - Crest of a Knave Genesis - Invisible Touch |
Yes, yes. I've got that now. If you've read the rest of the comments in the thread you'd realize that i've been informed of this already. But thanks.
|
I would like to chip in my penny worth and say Asia are a 'stadium band' not AOR or Prog.
|
Quote:
|
Still Stadium Rocking after all these years, here's something from the Omega album. You either like it or don't, but I have to admit that at least calling it Asia is still more marketable (at least in Italy) than Wetton, Howe, Downes, and Palmer. At least it's not as bad as Side One of ELPs Love Beach (The album that sold it's own Jogging Shorts!) - Not great, mind, but just saying...
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:03 AM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.