Queensryche - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Prog & Psychedelic Rock
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-06-2012, 02:36 AM   #2 (permalink)
Horribly Creative
 
Unknown Soldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
I like Queensryche a great lot. Geoff Tate is a great singer and the guitarists of the band (whose names both escape me and I find that I am too lazy to look up who they are right now) complement the band as a whole, since I greatly appreciate guitar related benefits to listening to music.

But mainly what this thread is about is this: I always see Queensryche qualifying with progressive music, and I cannot understand why.

Now I love Queensryche, by all means, do not get me wrong. But is there anyone who can explain to me why this band is so often considered to be a progressive band? All that I can see within their music as progressive is their brilliance behind the concept albums that they release and the few longer songs that they've released.

Has progressive music become so embedded in my young vein that I don't even realize it as apart from the pack? Is Queensryche just a more mainstream prog-band that is so subtle that I don't realize their progressivism? Please, these questions plague me because I have no legitimate problems other than odd queries that resonate through my mind, so a definitive answer would hinder me well.
Chris DeGarmo and Michael Wilton are the guitarists you're looking for. In general I agree with what you're saying above, just too many bands are classified especially in the metal genre as being progressive. When I think of prog, I always think of intricate song structures and instrumentation, and different textures within the songs. A lot of prog metal just seems to be lengthy instrumentals, song and tempo changes and a bit of jazz etc thrown in and based around a concept, which often in many people's eyes classifies it as prog. Personally, I'd like to see a lot of prog metal acts classified as technical metal acts, because that is what a lot really are.

As for Queensryche, the banded peaked without a doubt on Operation Mindcrime and Geoff Tate's voice really set them apart. Since then they've had some good albums, but in general they sound like a band especially on their more recent material, as a band unable to return to the days of yore.
Unknown Soldier is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.