Should rock be considered prog just because it's technical? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Prog & Psychedelic Rock
Should rock be considered prog just because it's technical? Should rock be considered prog just because it's technical?
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-07-2012, 06:59 PM   #34 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorOldPo View Post
Technicality should never be linked with music progression in terms of originality.
What do you suggest would be some good examples of being progressive without technicality?

I was listening to Drama by Yes today from 1980 and realized that their best songs on the album were basically throwbacks to their original 70s style and sound.

Black Sabbath I don't think has ever really been considered as being a progressive rock band, but I think they more than demonstrated that they could write and produce actual progressive music with songs like Air Dance from their Never Say Die album.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.