Should rock be considered prog just because it's technical? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Prog & Psychedelic Rock
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-29-2011, 06:27 PM   #10 (permalink)
Luciferian
 
SIRIUSB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Necromancer View Post
"Yes" would've been my next pick, how about Kansas? (Art Rock)

I actually never personally liked to label Genesis as being progressive (whatever). Pink Floyd is defiantly one of the core prog bands.
Floyd has so many eras they're hard to nail, love them though.
Kansas and bands like that to me came across as fluffy, but that's me.
You might actually dig some of my stuff (not exactly Prog Rock but very progressive).

Where does PR turn into Jazz Fusion? (I hate these labels but whatever)
SIRIUSB is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.