Should rock be considered prog just because it's technical? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Prog & Psychedelic Rock
Should rock be considered prog just because it's technical? Should rock be considered prog just because it's technical?
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-29-2011, 05:46 PM   #10 (permalink)
Luciferian
 
SIRIUSB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 278
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Necromancer View Post
I agree with Tull being a bad example for progressive. Rush is the ultimate and perfect example of progressive rock in my opinion.

I never was a fan of Jethro Tull either, but its cool if others are.
I saw a cable show of a recent concert from Rush, and man Geddy Lee was just fantastic, Pert was great, Lifeson too loud and distorted but ok.
SIRIUSB is offline   Reply With Quote
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.