Should rock be considered prog just because it's technical? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Prog & Psychedelic Rock
Should rock be considered prog just because it's technical? Should rock be considered prog just because it's technical?
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-26-2011, 05:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
Luciferian
 
SIRIUSB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 278
Default
I don't consider either the Allmans or Led Zep to be Progressive Rock . . . . King Crimson and Jethro Tull are Progressive Rock.

Progressive Rock has always been colored with odd time signatures, of which both Crimson & Tull are masters.
Last edited by SIRIUSB; 10-27-2011 at 07:52 AM.
SIRIUSB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.